from wikipedia it shows you that it was a subset of climate scientists... those agw nutters published in (pro nutter you can bet) journals "recently". A poll performed by Peter Doran and Maggie Kendall Zimmerman at Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago received replies from 3,146 of the 10,257 polled Earth scientists. Results were analyzed globally and by specialization. 76 out of 79 climatologists who "listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change" believe that mean global temperatures have risen compared to pre-1800s levels, and 75 out of 77 believe that human activity is a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures. Among all respondents, 90% agreed that temperatures have risen compared to pre-1800 levels, and 82% agreed that humans significantly influence the global temperature. Economic geologists and meteorologists were among the biggest doubters, with only 47 percent and 64 percent, respectively, believing in significant human involvement.
So to recap : 1)Oreskes found that out of all the papers on climate science between 1993 and 2003 that not a single one rejected the consensus position. 2) Doran in 2009 found that 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate change responded yes. ..... "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" 3) So for today...in 2010 Anderegg did a study that surveyed all climate scientists who have publicly signed declarations supporting or rejecting the consensus. They find between 97% to 98% of climate experts support the consensus (Anderegg 2010) So, so far we have three different studies by different authors showing at least a 97% consensus. More to come.
Senate democrats plan all night talkathon on climate change tonight through tues morning according to a usatoday article linked at drudge. Two notables from article. 1. Democrats in close races next election will not participate. I guess they are too scared to participate in this hoax. 2. There will be no legislation discussed at the talkathon. Only discussion of the need to do something about this <s>issue</s> hoax. Obviously using the playbook from obamacare on how to push through a gigantic lie. "Find out what's in it after we pass it."
So to recap : 1)Oreskes found that out of all the papers on climate science between 1993 and 2003 that not a single one rejected the consensus position. 2) Doran in 2009 found that 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate change responded yes. ..... "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" 3) So for today...in 2010 Anderegg did a study that surveyed all climate scientists who have publicly signed declarations supporting or rejecting the consensus. They find between 97% to 98% of climate experts support the consensus (Anderegg 2010) So, so far we have three different studies by different authors showing at least a 97% consensus. More to come.
so to recap: Senate democrats plan all night talkathon on climate change tonight through tues morning according to a usatoday article linked at drudge. Two notables from article. 1. Democrats in close races next election will not participate. I guess they are too scared to participate in this hoax. 2. There will be no legislation discussed at the talkathon. Only discussion of the need to do something about this issue hoax. Obviously using the playbook from obamacare on how to push through a gigantic lie. "Find out what's in it after we pass it."
its far less absurd than you quoting "studies" which talk about papers explicitly rejecting the consensus... You are the troll trying to promote something as scientific with a fraudulent consensus and no science.