I have him on ignore and still have to read his bullshit. It seeps right through the cracks here at ET. Smells awful.
Just curious, but are you going to address the article? I think it was bigarrow saying there was no proof of voter fraud ever uncovered, or something like that.
That is why bigarrow never gets onto my ignore list. Whether or not you agree with him he generally will try to refute issues on an informational level. He doesn't get real personal until somebody gets personal towards him, in my opinion. I've stopped launching insults towards bigarrow for that very reason. If somebody is willing to debate then I want to read their posts. Sometimes a particularly effective liberal is able to alter my view of an issue, Ricter for instance. Sometimes Bob Beckel has the same effect lol.