What a well-crafted counter argument. Anyway, this reaction makes me curious: where do you draw the line between speculation on a Picasso painting, and price gouging on a life-saving product (i.e. Martin Shkreli)? Do you make a distinction between the two or should there, in your view, be no restrictions to pure supply and demand? I think one of the perks of living in an organized society (as opposed to pure anarchy) is specifically that we agree on common rules. Regulating the markets of essential services to maximize their availability, for example. There's quite a leap from there to socialism, if that's what you're hinting at.
I am an anarchocapitalist so we will have to agree to disagree but that's cool--- i can see your point. Peace & love, Hampton
Internet Marketing 101 ...... You are lacking. Obviously. How would your read this NO1(No One) or NO1(number 1)? Totally agree with irritating double meaning and does not rhyme at all. Oh, by the way, you are trying to sell something that will never be used as a team or a group because it is limited to 1 and trader. Who would want to open an organization to have 1 trader. I think you better off advertising it as NO ONE trader and make a story behind it.