He would be considered a "meat gazer," and yes, he would have been "educated" as to why that's not cool... In the Army of today (what a FUCKING JOKE!), his faggot ass would have been protected. In the USMC, he would suffer, and deservingly so. I'll say, once the LAST REAL American military organization succumbs to faggot, nazi shit, it's all over here...
You need to see a Doctor Leap, seriously. You're all fucked up mentally. I mean,at your age, still preparing for a revolution , training for a black-belt , traveling to another state just to smoke a joint , making 6 figures trading and still seeking to be free whilst insisting on feeling sad all at the same time ? You wanna feel free . . . smoke that joint on your front porch , with a cold beer in the other hand instead of masturbating with that automatic and i will tell Bigarrow to go easy on you in future. thats because i'm concerned about you. you fucknut..
How old were the founding fathers when they were preparing for revolution? You can answer later, don't miss your school bus just over this question.
What are the techniques you need to perform on the test? Are we talking about things like Tenshi Nage, Kote Gaieshi, etc? Or is it more kenjistu, etc... My shodan test included about 13 main techniques, with approx 20 variants off those. Then we did atemi, geri waza, ground work, weapons (Sai, jo, katana) and randori. There was a written exam that kinda pissed me off because some of the questions were so ambiguous.
An Absolute Right to Refuse Service March 3, 2014 - 9:30 AM By J. Matt Barber - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/commentary/j-matt-barber/absolute-right-refuse-service#sthash.15MfOdIb.dpuf Albert Einstein once said, "Never do anything against conscience even if the state demands it." He was right. In the aftermath of the Arizona religious freedom skirmish, I have a few questions for those who would presume to compel religious business owners, under penalty of law, to "provide goods and services" to homosexuals in a way that violates that business owner's conscience. To wit: Should a homosexual baker be forced to make a "God Hates Fags" cake for Westboro Baptist Church, simply because its members claim to be Christian? Should a black printer be forced to develop and print thousands of "White Power!" flyers for a skinhead rally just because the potential customer is white? Should a Christian florist be compelled to create and provide black floral arrangements to a hell-bound customer for her upcoming Satanist ritual? Should a "progressive," environmentalist sign-maker be required to design and manufacture "Global Warming Is a Farce" signs for a tea party rally? Should a Muslim photographer, commissioned by San Francisco's "Folsom Street Fair," be forced to document that vile event - rife with nudity and public sex - simply because the customers identify as "gay"? Should a "gay married" lesbian hotel owner - a card-carrying member of GLAAD - be required, under threat of incarceration, to host and cater a fundraiser for the "National Organization for Marriage," a group that opposes so-called "marriage equality"? If you said no to any of the above, and you opposed Arizona's cowardly vetoed SB1062, then you're logically inconsistent and need to re-evaluate your position...