Yes. Immigration from countries that do not have adequate security standards and do not share criminal data and other background information has been curtailed. Thank you Mr. Trump. Sudan can always choose to comply with the requirements and request reconsideration and demonstrate compliance. Immigration rules do and will change depending on what is right for America, not for the shithole country. The aforementioned immigrant arrived before the rule change and everyone continues to wish her well. She is here lawfully.
Under Trump the rules benefit Trump. Don’t confuse yourself. There is no security strategy behind this, just a culture war. You are correct in that the woman arrived before the ban and we all benefit from her here. It is our loss that we do not continue to accept other persons from the Sudan.
No. The immigration rules that we apply to all or individual countries can change as needed. No permission slip from the UN needed. China may be sending countless students and business people to this country. Then they misbehave such as by spying, unleashing viruses, mistreating Hong Kong, etc, and the welcome mat is taken up. You see how it works? It is based on what American wants and needs. They have no entitlement to be here whatsoever. None. Further, going back to the Sudan issue for a minute, you may perhaps notice that since Trump implemented some of these changes the number of Islamic "incidents" has in fact decreased considerably. We know that you would like to turn that around to continually "improve" our foreign policy. Just as the left will not be happy until they have "improved" domestic policies in our cities to the point where they are no longer liveable. Note further, that even though your ilk consistently refer to such policies as are applied to the Sudan as "the Muslim Ban" that the largest population Muslim countries in the world were not banned. An inconvenient truth. You say that it is "our loss that we do not continue to accept other persons from the Sudan." Wrong again. It is Sudan's loss that they refuse to meet the minimum security requirements needed to vet their immigrants thus depriving many of them of the opportunity to come to the greatest country on earth. Americans will be just fine without them until they comply. After all, the line of people wishing to come here is rather long and diverse already.
I think the GOP convention had something going on night two but last night seemed very disingenuous altogether. Too much exaggeration and disconnection from reality seemed phony overall. Does anyone actually think Trump charmed Angela Merkel? No. There was also a lot of “they said” I couldn’t do this and “they said” I couldn’t do that, too, but who is they? No one. Again, my own opinion. It was too much bullshitting last night. Other people might believe it though I don’t know.
You might want to think that through a bit. You are supposed to be making your point not mine. I guess you are a giver.
Really? So how do you tell what you are getting when a place like the Sudan has no records, no security background checks, and the ones doing the checks if they did any are and as you keep pointing out they have no motive to send their best and their brightest? Oh, and even if they did do security checks and maintain adequate records, who would be doing that. I see. The government of Sudan, a state sponsor of terrorism. Nice. A very efficient way to send their terrorist shit around the world You go on the assumption that anyone who shows up is a benefit to the country so we should not be inquiring into such things. The dem script and trance state requires you to think that way. We don't need unknown quantities. They may need to come but we don't need them.