It's great for plants and we are going to need more and bigger crops to feed the overpopulation of the world. Like I said before, another mini ice age is what we should be afraid of because it will destroy harvests and hundreds of millions will starve to death. It would probably lead to some wars over food supply, too.
Funny how FC pulls complete information out of thin air to support his belief. Instead of looking at the facts and drawing a conclusion, he obviously draws a conclusion then finds facts to support his conclusion. That's not modern science, that's medieval alchemy.
Translation: Since any evidence that shows that the average temperature has been on the rise for the last 12,500 years (with the exception of the Little Ice Age, 1350 to 1850) and the end of the last ice age may not have yet come falls outside of the last 100 years or so, and does not support our agenda, we prefer to disregard it.
Let me repeat. VIRTUALLY ALL THE WORLD'S CLIMATE SCIENTISTS AND ALL THE WORLD'S SCIENCE ORGANIZATIONS AGREE ON THE BASIC TENANTS OF AGW. THAT IS AN INDISPUTABLE FACT. Perhaps twenty years ago there was good reason to be a skeptic, but at this point the deniers just look foolish. ". A survey of all peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'global climate change' published between 1993 and 2003 shows that not a single paper rejected the consensus position that global warming is man caused. 75% of the papers agreed with the consensus position while 25% made no comment either way, focusing on methods or paleoclimate analysis (Oreskes 2004). Several subsequent studies confirm that â...the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processesâ. (Doran 2009). In other words, more than 95% of scientists working in the disciplines contributing to studies of our climate, accept that climate change is almost certainly being caused by human activities. We should also consider official scientific bodies and what they think about climate change. There are no national or major scientific institutions anywhere in the world that dispute the theory of anthropogenic climate change. Not one. In the field of climate science, the consensus is unequivocal: human activities are causing climate change." http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm
The center of the milky way galaxy is a torsion field generator whose waves impact the solar systems of our galaxy universally. If we were to look at the climate changes of other planets, NASA already sees that those planets are changing just as the entire galaxy is changing. AGW is bunk horseshit built on a panic short squeeze by the look of the chart and let me repeat for future currents that there are no credible scientific people with the proper background and training claiming that there is AGW. They really just say there's not enough data. I hate how climate change in p&r keeps coming up with useless debate when educated folks don't need to hear anything but be properly introduced to the literature, which very clearly states that there is no conclusive evidence of AGW nor any way for "evidence" to ever be conclusive. Torsion fields particularly have contributed to the rise in temperature at least in our own solar system, and this has absolutely nothing to do with man made climate change.
New NASA Report Shows Scientific Consensus on Global Warming From Four Independent Institutions by Kristine Lofgren, 01/23/13 For those who still harbor a shred of doubt about the reality of climate change, a recent report released by NASA should put those doubts to rest. According to the report, four independent institutions tracking climate trends have confirmed that the planet is continuing to get warmer. The information shows that not only is the increase trending as predicted, but that the warming is indeed man-made. Every year, four independent centers track and tally information from data centers around the planet and make independent judgements based on that information. The NASA report shows that all four centers, including NASAâs own Goddard Institute for Space Studies, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center, the Japanese Meteorological Agency, and the Met Office Hadley Centre in the United Kingdom, show similar peaks and valleys across the board, starting in 1880 and continuing until 2012. Overall, each institution identifies a distinct warming trend. According to the report, 2012 was the ninth hottest year since 1880 and the ten warmest years have all occurred since 1998. In fact, the last year that the temperature was below average was in 1976. Although temperatures tend to fluctuate from year to year, the overall trend shows a distinct increase, which trends right along with the amount of CO2 that is being released into the atmosphere. The continued warming is already impacting life on the planet and the effects will only get worse unless CO2 levels decrease. Read more: New NASA Report Shows Scientific Consensus on Global Warming From Four Independent Institutions | Inhabitat - Sustainable Design Innovation, Eco Architecture, Green Building