I think there are thread on this before but I'm unable to find it... so I thought those who have experience on both of the feed can five some review :eek:
The quality of the TT data you receive will depend upon who is maintaining the TT server you are receiving from, how much aggregation they use, their hardware, etc. For e-mini's on NinjaTrader I have seen nothing faster nor fuller than Zen-Fire data. Eurex, though, is another story. TT wins hands down there, not least because of the infamous '99' prints issue with Zen-Fire's Eurex data. P.S. What odds that AMPFutures will soon be along spamming this thread with their generic Premier Ninja broker nonsense?
I don't care that Ninja/Zenfire/Eurex prints"99 fills" all the time, as long as the Ninja/Zenfire/Eurex feed is as fast as TT/Eurex...
The only reason I went with Mirus Vs AMP is the SPAM! AMP also has slightly higher commissions folks. I will not do business with a firm that uses these marketing tactics. Nice work AMP. Ninja/ZenFire is Ninja Zen-Fire!
AMP has higher commission? but they have lower day margin? about the eurex-zenfire/TT ok i'm lost TT is great to trade with european exchanges while zf is better with US exchanges?
I will attempt to clarify; Zen-Fire for CME mini's ( ES/NQ/etc ) is faster than TT. Zen-Fire data for Eurex is slower than TT. In any case, Zen is not a feasible alternative for me while the '99' issue remains unresolved. This is the conclusion of my own side-by-side testing of Zen vs TT datafeeds using NinjaTrader as the front end. This opinion is the result of my own experience, with the testing being done from Europe. I would advise anybody who takes a serious interest in their data to conduct their own testing and arrive at their own conclusions. Good to see at least a few others are also tired of AMP's marketing techniques!