My understanding is that it was about changing the username in a quoted post. Besides, your comment is still there. If I've got that wrong I'm sure I will be hearing from the Big M. Besides, all the liberal kooks manage to create all the usernames they want and come back reincarnated when they get banned. So, no problem.
You are actually wrong there. My intent was to really find out why the GOP is dumping the best guy they have overboard for Newt? Newt!!!????? I think the GOP has lost control of the hard right wing of it's party. The hard right wing is the soul of the GOP party. Do you disagree with this? And if so, why?
Well okay, fine. This place would not be as fun without extremists like you in it, so don't fuk it up for the rest of us.
I'm not wrong, and you can pretend otherwise all you want. If you had posted the above in your OP, then I would have agreed. Whatever, you want to play coy, play coy. To answer your question above, though, I think the GOP has, for a while now, missed on the true desire of the party - and that is of fiscal conservatism. You claim Romney is the best guy that is being "dumped overboard" but fiscal conservatives see Romney as not conservative enough. I know I do - and NOT from a social perspective, but from a fiscal one.
OK, I'll watch my ass, bud. I gotta keep those conservative posts coming so you liberals have access to the truth.
That must be why the world watches Fox. CABLE NEWS RACE VIEWERS NITE OF 12/12/11 FOXNEWS O'REILLY 3,271,000 FOXNEWS HANNITY 2,168,000 FOXNEWS BAIER 2,030,000 CMDY DAILY SHOW 1,642,000 FOXNEWS GRETA 1,440,000 CMDY COLBERT 1,281,000 MSNBC SCHULTZ 877,000 MSNBC SHARPTON 830,000 MSNBC HARDBALL 797,000 MSNBC MADDOW 722,000 CNNHN GRACE 696,000 CNN COOPER 634,000 CNN PIERS MORGAN 604,000
BS. EVERYBODY is a fiscal conservative at this stage in the game. It will boil down to the social issues, and Newt is a dead duck in that arena. At least Mittens is clean in that area.
The world also reads between a 5th and 8th grade level. And Faux is well aware that they can manipulate this level of education.
What's shocking is the lengths of non-sequitur you will go to to distract from the obvious: you suggested threads should not be started for the purposes of getting replies. Here you are presuming to lecture other people on the merits of replying to a thread when you are doing the exact opposite of what you preach. That's called hypocrisy. Shocking that I have to point out something so obvious to you.