no, it is not novel nor rare use statute , almost every single nyag used this, the latest is vs trump but not limit to trump, ny state vs corp fraud cases generally cites this statute. vs charles schwab, vs credit suisse, vs juul, vs ups, vs amazon, etc. https://casetext.com/search?q=63(12)&sort=relevance&p=1&type=case
It is novel due to the fact that there are no complainants, no victims and no damages. It is being misused to get Trump.
Is it my imagination or coincidence? The biggest assholes in life are usually shouting the loudest for the whole world to hear about being the victim.
you can be assured: one way or another - a *solution* will be found for this problem - donald stinky trump
The next time a red-neck cop pulls me over for speeding i'm going to ask him to show me 'the victim.'
There is a conspiracy no doubt to get President Donald Trump at all costs. All these lawsuits are designed to bleed him of his financial resources to even run a good campaign. No doubt the work of filthy rich, elitists from the left, with blessings from the Democrats. Also, the two tiered system of justice is wide open to see for all Americans. Some of our ET trolls who actually, are Americans should remember that any rights of President Donald Trump that they manage to take away means you lost those rights as well as every other American. Do not think you will still have those rights because you are an extreme liberal Democrat? Do you honestly, think the Democrats care about your ass? Who are you anyways?
Ridiculous analogy as speeding is a violation of criminal statutes, not civil ones. Furthermore, driving is a privilege, not a right.