Some Usual Tard trolling going on here. Yeh, sure, a constitutional lecture from a left-turd. Dems idea of a Constitutional Convention.
Lol, Republicans are not the only ones peddling misinformation. The majority of Conservatives believe it’s ok to overturn results if, IF, it can be proven that enough fraudulent votes were cast to affect the outcome. Why would anyone support an election that is proven to be wrong? Just because you believe the election was fair, there’s roughly half of the country that believes otherwise. And just because someone has doubts about election integrity doesn’t make them a radical domestic terrorist. This new narrative of labeling everyone who thinks differently from you as some type of second class citizen that needs incarceration and re-education is twisted sick. And get off the patriotic soapbox. Liberals, in truth, could care less about the founding principles of individual freedom this country was built on.
Just because you believe in the wizard in the sky, it doesn't mean you get to waste my taxes prolatizing your fantasy. Same shit with non existent voter fraud. It sure as hell doesn't mean you get to disenfranchise tens of thousands w/unconstitutional measures because you're sore losers who want to change the rules of the game. You're all making Hillary pussyhat wearers look like fearless warriors after the 2016 election.
Talk about peddling bullcrap. No ones disenfranchising tens of thousands w/unconstitutional measures - that’s liberal disinformation at it’s finest. And don’t lecture anyone about changing the rules of the game. This whole mess falls flat on Democrats and their illegal election law changes involving absentee ballots. States are just trying to make sure the crap doesn’t happen again.
What crap is that, a free and fair election? Sure, bought and paid SCOTUS holding that AZ can tell grandma to fuck off for wanting her grandkid to drop off her ballot, then demanding she stand in line for 20 hrs due to reduced polling places because she'll be tossed in jail if she dares vote in a different location not assigned to her is not disenfranchisement in your fairytale world. That's if she remembered to vote for dog catcher in the last two elections to remain eligible in the first place. Bought and paid SCOTUS telling us it's perfectly fine to have dark money (and foreign money at this point) donors remain undisclosed as the GQP dumps untold millions into propaganda lobbying for said measures is not aiding in disenfranchisement either in your fairytale world either I suppose?