Not sure how many of you guys are following the AB5 catastrophe that was the latest to come out of the politicians in California, but I have - because of the industry I'm in. What a disaster. ------------------------- New freelance law AB5 illustrates what’s wrong with the Democratic super-majority in Sacramento By DIANE DIXON FEB. 18, 2020 11:13 AM If you want to see how badly things can go south in a one-party state, look no further than the new law known as Assembly Bill 5. The law basically requires many businesses that use independent contractors to reclassify those workers as employees. Proposed and pushed by labor unions, and waltzed through the Democratic-controlled Legislature, the law was portrayed as a way to get big businesses to pony up a fair wage and benefits for all their workers. However, the reality is that AB5 was drafted by a union organizer, and this bill was designed as a way to grow union membership. Independent contractors cannot unionize, but if you convert them into employees, you can try to make them union members. And when the people you’re supposedly helping end up suing you, you’ve really messed it up. Organizations representing independent truckers and freelance writers and photographers have gone to court to get the law overturned, at least as it’s applied to them. The truckers note that AB5 is unconstitutional because it will have an impact on interstate commerce, which is the purview of the federal government. Plus, it interferes with their right to form contracts with whomever they please. The freelancers have a different legal argument, but their motivation is that AB5 is going to cost many of them their livelihoods. Organizations that use freelancers are not going to bring them all in-house. They’ll either spread the work among existing employees, bring in a fraction of their freelancers and have them do it all, find out-of-state sources of content or just do without. This is the upshot for many independent contractors — from retirees who continue to work as consultants, to young parents who need flexible hours to raise their families, to construction workers, to nurses, physical therapists and many other healthcare workers — they’re not going to gain protections, they’re going to lose work and lose income. Of course, AB5 was also a message to the new and burgeoning app-based business sector ( most notably Uber and Lyft) that Sacramento is the boss in this state and they’re looking at you, Silicon Valley. Now, poking one of the state’s major industries in the eye — especially one that is eminently mobile — is a pretty bad idea. Poking several of the state’s major industries in the eye is just an awful idea. But guess what? AB5 is also disrupting the film and music industries. Some out-of-state companies doing business here have already said they’re going to suspend California operations, while many homegrown companies are eyeing the door. And who’s suffering? The film production workers, musicians and technicians — the workers Sacramento was sanctimoniously “protecting.” So, drive away both the tech and entertainment sectors and guess what? California is back to selling oranges, folks. AB5 is a job-killer, and it must be repealed. Truck drivers, journalists, translators, event planners, photographers, land surveyors, musicians, manicurists, even rabbis, are all being harmed. This is no way to run a state. We need more people with real-world business experience in our Legislature who understand how Sacramento is harming our economy. People with good, flexible jobs, who could set their own hours, are now losing the independence they wanted in their jobs and may even lose their jobs entirely. As a person who spent decades in the leadership of a Fortune 300 company and has served as a council member and two-time mayor in local government, I know that things won’t get better until Sacramento gets some adults who can work with both businesses and workers, who are fiscally responsible and who are aware that their actions can have unintended and counterproductive consequences and exercise the proper caution and forethought. Our Legislature is filled with career public employees and union activists. We need more people with private sector experience who actually understand the implications of proposed laws. We need legislators who want to grow our economy, rather than abuse the legislative process to give gifts to their favorite special interest groups at the expense of everyone else. Diane Dixon is a Newport Beach councilmember, two-time mayor and a Republican candidate for state Assembly.
I notice no one from the left ever defended AB5 in California. Most folks here probably have no idea what the hell it is. A good watch.
Not surprising that the hardcore leftist prefers the collectivist version of the workforce, they're communists at heart. The idea of independent anything is a big no no. Their perfect utopia has us working at an assigned task, no need to ask what task, they'll decide that for you. You'll live in assigned housing, don't ask where, they'll decide that too. Shopping for the basic needs are all taken care of too, at the assigned store, at the assigned time, receiving the assigned food. No need for money either, it's all deducted from your assigned pay rate and the real beauty is your balance is always zero. No worry about going broke as you are perpetually broke. So what does one do for fun. You get to watch the one channel state sponsored ministry of truth who will endlessly tell you just how fuckin great you have it.
I know, but you never see lefties go "yeah, this is pretty stupid." when it comes to their "side". Conservatives usually defend principles (not always, but usually). Liberals defend people, not principles (again, not always, but usually).