<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=940745> My (rather skillfull) photoshop efforts of CNBC chicks on scantily clad porn models were apparently unappreciated by the moderators. You're right, ET members would have no interest in <i>that</i>...
ET has had a mention in Barron's. The Barron's people were able to find, believe it or not, an intelligent thread. Therefore, an effort must be put forth to elevate ET and remove any unsavory post. This apparently includes risque' pics, and some of my attempts at "humor".
More Joe Kernan.. Blah.. I just added Bloomberg to my satellite.. What's the deal with the split second ticker before the morning opens.. Who they foolin..
Get a grip. This isn't the place for topless photos - I was the one that complained about it and frankly, I'm suprised and a little dissappointed that you were not banned for it. This should be a place where I don't have to worry if my daughter is watching me read threads or not.
dude... photo wasn't topless shows much less than you could have seen driving to your prop office on some bilboard somewhere.. or magazine or New york times newspaper add imo sheesh... some people.
Ummm "dude", evidently you didn't see the second "photoshop" before it was pulled - I know what topless looks like, and it was definately topless. Unless you call totally bare breasts something other than topless. So, sheesh some people yourself........
geesus Reardon, I saw the original photo and I must say, back to chit chat lock-up you go (why did they let you out)