the only grounds i can see is business interference which would be highly difficult to sustain in court under the listed circumstances. who owns the turtle and/or trend following trademarks? i would imagine those words would be exceedingly difficult to trademark and defend same.
as someone pointed out in another thread. there are too many disclaimers you have to sign when trading futures
There's disclaimers when you want to trade/invest in anything. When I was a stockbroker I gave people a 'mini' book full of disclaimers. Even if they just wanted to buy stock once. Or one mutual fund. That's common whether it's futures, stocks, options, etc. The reason those are necessary is that when people blow their 5 grand account out, the co's have some protection from frivolous lawsuits.
I've heard of people suing anyway when they lose money. A few of these cases even one. I definately would not want to be a broker.
Alex has a ton of stories from when he was a broker. Some of them are quite sad. I wish I could get him to write a book with these things. Cajun
My2Cents, I've reserved a spot for you, feel free login and experience the profitable 'crap' first hand. Its about 30 minutes in length and wont even cost you two cents CajunSniper / Puretick.com Administrator-Trader
Thanks, but no thanks. I'll pass. The last thing I want to do is register to your site. This will automatically put me on your mailing list. After a number of attempts to induce me to subscribe to your site my info will be sold to a distributor. Then my e-mail address will be compromised by some spam incubator. The last thing I need is another e-mail touting the latest micro-stock reputed to be the next Microsoft. If it looks like crap and smells like crap then guess what! It's CRAP! Ciaó my2cents