New Benghazi Whistleblowers Will Spill The Beans

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by pspr, May 21, 2013.

  1. pspr

    pspr

    More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon.

    These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law.

    According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

    The former diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in two areas — what Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi and the pressure put on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and therefore responsible for Libya, not to act to protect jeopardized U.S. personnel.

    Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.

    Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”

    This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens.

    The former diplomat who spoke with PJ Media regarded the whole enterprise as totally amateurish and likened it to the Mike Nichols film Charlie Wilson’s War about a clueless congressman who supplies Stingers to the Afghan guerrillas. “It’s as if Hillary and the others just watched that movie and said ‘Hey, let’s do that!’” the diplomat said.

    He added that he and his colleagues think the leaking of General David Petraeus’ affair with his biographer Paula Broadwell was timed to silence the former CIA chief on these matters.

    Regarding General Ham, military contacts of the diplomats tell them that AFRICOM had Special Ops “assets in place that could have come to the aid of the Benghazi consulate immediately (not in six hours).”

    Ham was told by the White House not to send the aid to the trapped men, but Ham decided to disobey and did so anyway, whereupon the White House “called his deputy and had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of his command.”

    The White House motivation in all this is as yet unclear, but it is known the Ham retired quietly in April 2013 as head of AFRICOM.

    PJ Media recognizes this is largely hearsay, but the two diplomats sounded quite credible. One of them was in a position of responsibility in a dangerous area of Iraq in 2004.


    http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2013...s-with-info-devastating-to-clinton-and-obama/
     
  2. jem

    jem

    wow... if this is true and this was reported by Glen Beck since about day one....


    Good Job Mr. President
    Good bye Ms. Clinton

    3 AM came and you not only do you and the President decline to pick up the phone but you caused it to ring. Then you lied about it.

    This cover up is about to rise to a criminal conspiracy to cover up the dumbest foreign policy mistake we could imagine.
     
  3. Benghazi'ers are the new birthers,the results will be the same
     
  4. jem

    jem

    yes - just like the patriots who said the IRS was targeting their groups.
     
  5. "Do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk, ice cream? Ice cream, Mandrake? Children's ice cream!...You know when fluoridation began?...1946. 1946, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh?

    It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual, and certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.

    I first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love... Yes, a profound sense of fatigue, a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I — I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence. I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women, er, women sense my power, and they seek the life essence. I do not avoid women, Mandrake...but I do deny them my essence."

    I now only drink pure grain alcohol and rain water!"

    ------Col. Jack D. Ripper



    Everything is a conspiracy to the republican mind.
     
  6. jem

    jem

    did the the IRS target conservative groups or not.

    Fact... they did.

    did Obama produce his birth records for a court in Georgia or choose not to show up.

    Fact... he never produced his records.

    did the administration rewrite the Benghazi talking pionts.

    Fact... they did.

    Do you just use leftist bullshit tactics tactics of lies and misdirection...

    Fact... you did.





     
  7. Any idiot would've targeted the flood of applications designated as 501(c)4. The tea party providing social welfare services is like Jem being able to normalize data. (It should be of no surprise it was a Bush appointee that was in charge of the IRS during this.)


    Obama presented the long form on tv. There was no need to go to Georgia.


    Benghazi, IRS, birth certificate:

    [​IMG]
     
  8. pspr

    pspr

    If this comes out this way, it is curtains for O and C. Even without the other major scandals.
     
  9. pspr

    pspr

    Don't be so stupid. If you think this isn't a targeting of conservative groups only and is capable of bringing down Obamby you don't understand the magnitude of the problem. Try reading!

     
  10. jem

    jem

    no need to appear in court and risk default.... do you lie your ass off much.

    there is a difference between authenticating records to a court or state body under oath and presenting documents on the internet or t.v to anyone with and a brain wave.

    Had Orly Taitz taken the offer of default from the judge.. a new can of worms would have been opened for Obama.

    Orly made a really bad decision and I commented on it while we were still waiting on the decision.


     
    #10     May 21, 2013