I see you skipped rebuttal and went to straight to ad hominem that's just laughable (like all of your opinions). Obviously you are afraid to debate it because you KNOW I'm correct.
The left has a long history of abusing women and taking them for granted. Hillary in 2016 is her reward for being publicly humiliated time and again by her womanizing husband. Leftist women have no problem with men who use and abuse them. Just look at the way they fall all over themselves whem Bill shows up. In 2008 the party pushed her aside even though she was far more qualified than Obama, because the left has found it more important and politically profitable to pander to minorities rather than women. Leftist women can wait. They always have. Like the battered housewife who stays with her abusive husband, they just keep coming back for more. Hillary in 2016 is her new dress and a dinner as a reward for the beating she's taken over the years. Blacks also enjoy being beaten like slaves by the dem party. Their votes are bought and paid for with one failed program after another, but they, like the battered housewife, show up for another beating. Their support is bought for next to nothing. Adjusted for inflation they had more value as slaves.
Problem is, there's no smoking gun. As I wrote before, Obama and Clinton are far too politically savvy to have that happen. They immediately put several layers of protection between themselves and any real decision making. Piss poor leadership, but politically smart. Everyone except the most boot licking leftist partisan knows this thing was botched before, during, and after the attack. That and 5 bucks will get you a cup of crapola Starbucks coffee. No votes will be lost or gained over this. Pravda, North America Division is all smiles.
When does Rice testify? We need to hear that testimony, under oath, who instructed her to go out and tell the story about the video being responsible. We also need to know exactly who gave the order for the military rescue to stand down. Were these indivduals making these decisions, or was it a team effort and if so, who was in the room during those team meetings. Without that info, there isn't much to prosecute. Somebody made these decisions. Who was it? And if not Obama and/or Clinton, why not? Why were they not involved in a incident as big as an Embassy being attacked with loss of life?
they don't see it as crazy. They see themselves as heroic crusaders saving the sheeple from themselves. Don Quixote, anyone?
And both of you look silly slapping each other on the back in congratulations whilst furiously running from debate.