New Benghazi Hearings Could Be Explosive

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Apr 28, 2013.

  1. pspr

    pspr

    I didn't know you followed Fox so closely. But, I think you are under the false assumption that Fox manipulates the news like BSNBC does. Not so.
     
    #11     May 6, 2013
  2. The Party of Stupid knows it can't beat Hillary straight up so they'll drag this garbage til 2016.
     
    #12     May 6, 2013
  3. Hillary lied. They all lied, and it's coming out wednesday. Lucky for Hillary, Americans, especially those that vote democratic have short attention spans and even shorter memories. But hey, Obama got re-elected and 2016 is a million years away. All is well in the democratic party.
    Clinton sought end-run around counterterrorism bureau on night of Benghazi attack, witness will say.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ureau-on-night-benghazi-attack/#ixzz2SXBbhvgK
     
    #13     May 6, 2013
  4. Where is Romney . . . he really should be speaking up.
     
    #14     May 6, 2013

  5. A classic coverup, no question about it.
     
    #15     May 6, 2013
  6. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    The Party of Lies and Deception could end it if they just came out with the truth. Then none of us would have to wait around until 2016.
     
    #16     May 6, 2013
  7. There is simply no way to come to the conclusion that this admin didn't lie about benghazi. Unless of course, you are so biased as to believe anything your lord obama tells you.
     
    #17     May 6, 2013
  8. wjk

    wjk

    And yet Pelosi considers her the most qualified person that would ever seek the WH. Hillary dropped the ball big time on Benghazi. That should instantly disqualify her for office. I know a pilot who made one mistake landing his craft. His career as a Navy pilot ended that day because he was found to be at fault. (McCain’s would have ended as a pilot a lot sooner but for his dad).

    Hillary may be a champion of the left, but she is absolutely unqualified to be Commander in Chief.
     
    #18     May 6, 2013
  9. The Clintons have a sordid record going back over 30 years of abuse of power and coverups. If this were in Clinton's Arkansas, those whistleblowers would probably be at high risk of some dubious suicide or death that just never got solved. Google "Vince Foster".

    So this kind of thingis nothing new for Hillary. You could tell that with the sneering contmept she had for the Senators who dared question her. The Clinnton way is to viciously attack anyone who threatens you, particulalry if they're telling the truth. Youngsters who missed all this can google "Paula Jones" and a host of other women or "Ken Starr."

    This is a classic democrat coverup. They knew their foreign policy had been a disaster, even if the media had hid that fact, so they overreacted to this incident and tried to blame it on that stupid video. The media of course complied and carreid the ball for them, none more shamelessly htan that cow Cindy Crowley. Now it comes out, months later and post election, and their reaction is, "What difference does it make?" and "Can we move on?"

    We all know if the parties were reversed, if we had a republican president, that the Washington Post and NY Times would be leading the lynch mob calling for impeachment. That is not speculation because they did it to Richard Nixon over stuff that was so minor it wouldn't even make the news today. They tried to do it to Ronald Reagan but got their head handed to them by Oliver North.

    Obama won a tainted election, that is for sure. The republicans have no obligation to treat him as a legitimate president.
     
    #19     May 6, 2013
  10. wjk

    wjk


    Romney and the other RINOs never got the memo. Thus the kid gloves, which they wear to this day. I don't believe Hillary or the Bamster will be held to account over Benghazi.
     
    #20     May 6, 2013