New Benghazi Hearings Could Be Explosive

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Apr 28, 2013.

  1. Again, you pull things out of some alternate universe from which you live. Due to your age, tho, it is hard for me to come down on you. Make sure you walk every morning and get your fiber, okay?
     
    #101     May 10, 2013
  2. #102     May 10, 2013
  3. Max E.

    Max E.

    So you progressed from a libertarian who believes in little to no government into someone who believes the redistribution of wealth is a good thing???

    LOL, you are such an insane narcissist you will say anything in order to avoid admitting you are wrong under any circumstance, your lies on this site have been exposed too many times to count. You are a piece of trash and a burden to society and the world iks worse off because you were born.
     
    #103     May 10, 2013
  4. pspr

    pspr

    If your lies are in an alternative universe it would make sense that that must be where you live, Buck!

    I know you won't come down to Texas to see me. We've been over this fear you have about meeting white men before. You won't even go to Chicago to see Mavrick74 and let him buy you dinner.

    Hide all you want, Buck. We all know and have seen ample evidence that you can't tell the truth and get caught in your lies constantly.
     
    #104     May 10, 2013
  5. In other words, you fukked up.:D

    I accept your apology.:)
     
    #105     May 10, 2013
  6. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    NO Buckwheat, that's not what he said.
     
    #106     May 10, 2013
  7. But the administration wasn't thinking of political ramifications...my ass. That's all they were thinking about, and then have the nerve to accuse others of playing politics. As I've said before. The administration made it political the second they decided to start spinning the event into something it wasn't. And how quickly was that? Let's just say the bodies weren't cold when Team Obama went into damage control.

    According to ABC News, the original paragraph read:

    "The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa'ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador's convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks."

    But Nuland wrote that the lines "could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that either? Concerned ..."

    The paragraph in question was then reportedly deleted.


    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...times-official-concerned-would/#ixzz2SvM6yA00
     
    #107     May 10, 2013
  8. Max E.

    Max E.

    I hope you realise that the reason you are a complete and utter failure as a trader is because you are unwilling to admit your mistakes under any circumstsances and you are completely self unaware.

    I hope for your sake you are able to change this, because until you do you are going to continue to piss into the wind with your 1 dollar trading accounts, pretending to be a trader online.
     
    #108     May 10, 2013
  9. That's not what you read, but reading is not your forte, and that's cool.:)
     
    #109     May 10, 2013
  10. You are the one who throws shit at the wall and hopes for the best. I have a trading plan, and it works. :)
     
    #110     May 10, 2013