As jem has just shown, there are no docs tested in a court of law. But they have been tested by a law enforcement agency in Az, and in their law enforcement capacity they say the docs are not genuine and should have been investigated further by appropriate authorities. It just may be the biggest conspiracy ever.
THE ALLEGED OBAMA BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENT MICROFILMS "Regarding the microfilms, it has to be established that even if the Obama birth announcements were actually in the newspapers, it does not prove a Hawaii birth. Hawaii parents are/were able to file birth documents in Hawaii as long as they were residents, regardless of the actual birth place of the child. Additionally, no proof was required of the birth; only a written statement had to be made. Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961, and other subsequent Hawaii birth laws that allow registration with no proof, or allow Foreign Birth registration, leaves an opening to claim Hawaii “birth” without it being true. In 1961, once a birth document was filed with the Hawaii Department of Health (including those situations mentioned above as well as from the hospitals), the HDOH automatically issued birth announcements to the Hononlulu Advertiser and Star Bulletin. People that believe Obama was born in Hawaii typically rely on the microfilm printouts of the “alleged” Obama birth announcements from The Honolulu Star Advertiser and Star Bulletin. Talking heads like Bill O’Reilly pose foolish, illogical questions like “Are we supposed to believe that Obama’s mother planted the birth certificate in 1961 in Hawaii because she wanted Obama to be President?” Maybe a better question would be “How many people from other countries come here illegally to specifically have their children born here so they can obtain U.S. citizenship? However, none of the alleged more prominent journalists/talking heads, like O’Reilly and Chris Matthews (being the most prominent and most arrogant on the subject), have ever tried to find the original newspapers to confirm whether the microfilms are authentic. They just accepted what was fed to them by the Obama administration." from westernjournalism.com Only people ignorantly attempting to perpetuate a fraud consider newspaper announcements as legal documents.
That's my point exactly, since it has been well established that the only reason Barack's mom wanted a child is she knew ahead of time that if she could only have a child, that that little Muslim kid was going to be U.S. President some day.. That's precisely why when she was pregnant with Barack Hussein Obama in Kenya, see visited the Mosque to enlist the head poopbah emu's help in forging an Hawaii certificate of live birth and getting an announcement planted in the Hawaiian newspapers. If you don't believe me, there are plenty of reliable records of this visit to the Mosque on Twitter. The problem is they forgot to destroy the real Kenyan Birth Certificate which Donald Trump was able to unearth. It's well known that Hawaiian Hospitals play loosey goosey with records all the time. Infowars has printed many examples of loosey gooseiness in Hawaii going back many years. (Hawaii even lied about being a State!) And the newspapers in Hawaii are part of the Deep State conspiracy machine, that all came out on Facebook.
it was not a criminal proceeding. I saw no threat of contempt. anything to distract away from the fact obama chose to default rather than produce what should have been something easily produced. His lawyer would subpoena the record from HI and ask they produce a certified copy and get it to the court in an a manner acceptable under their evidence code. There are myraid ways to get documents into evidence. Especially state records.