yeah, i should be rather polite and accept that the medical mafia is the strongest, most effective warriors against dis-ease. they have performed double blind, randomized , pasteurized, sterilized studies on human subjects and 95% of them died after treatment! even with statisticians on board ! and, on your knees patients, it was published in peer reviewed journals with 50 years in business. so it makes chemo a credible, scientific method. i guess we can all cheer with happiness and continue to support the pharma with $. what else we have? natural plants hype?
"Milk causes allergies primarily because of pasteurization The entire project is a fool's errand to begin with since the reason most humans are allergic to cow's milk is because of pasteurization which destroys lactase enzymes. RAW MILK is far easier to digest, but of course raw milk has been all but criminalized in America, where the FDA along with Ventura County and LA County in California actually stage armed raids on raw milk distribution centers and throw people in jail. James Stewart, for example, remains in jail this very day for the "crime" of being involved in raw milk. Sign the petition HERE to demand freedom for James." great credibility this guy has. unpasturized milk carries all kinds of toxins. what has happened to people that they are so stupid that they want to go back to a time before we figured out how to stop these diseases? Infectious Microbes Found in Cowâs Milk â¢Bacillus cereus: These bacteria produce a toxin that can cause diarrhea and another that causes vomiting. Bacillus cereus spores are heat-resistant and may survive pasteurization. There have even been very rare cases linked to dried milk and dried infant formula. â¢Brucella: Brucella is a bacterial microbe that is found in unpasteurized dairy products. Brucella infection, or Brucellosis, has also been called âUndulant Feverâ because of the regular recurrence of fever associated with the disease. â¢Campylobacter jejuni: Campylobacter jejuni is the most common bacteria to cause diarrheal disease in the U.S. and is found in raw milk and poultry. It has an increased chance of causing disease when consumed in milk, because the basic pH of milk neutralizes the acidity of the stomach. â¢Coxiella burnetii: Coxiella infects a variety of animals, including livestock and pets. The microbe can be found in cowâs milk and is resistant to heat and drying. Infection by Coxiella results in Q fever, a high fever that may last up to 2 weeks. â¢E. coli O157:H7: This particular strain of E. coli has been associated with a number of food-borne outbreaks and is the cause of bloody diarrhea. Frequently associated with dairy cattle, microbial contamination of raw milk and soft cheeses can result in disease. â¢Listeria monocytogenes: Listeria is a common bacterial pathogen that is found in soft cheeses and unpasteurized milk. It can even survive below freezing temperatures and can therefore withstand refrigeration. It is particularly dangerous to individuals who have weakened immune systems, including pregnant women, AIDS patients, and the very young and very old. â¢Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis: This strain of mycobacteria can withstand pasteurization and has been associated with the development of Crohnâs disease, also known as inflammatory bowel syndrome. However, whether or not these bacteria can actually infect humans remains controversial. â¢Mycobacterium tuberculosis: The cause of âconsumption,â a horrific wasting disease that first affects the lungs, Mycobacterium bovis is associated with consumption of raw milk and was one of the most common contaminants prior to the practice of pasteurization. M. bovis causes tuberculosis in cows and can be passed to humans via unpasteurized cow's milk, causing a disease that is very similar to M. tuberculosis. â¢Salmonella: Salmonella contamination of raw milk and milk products has been the source of several outbreaks in recent years. Symptoms include diarrhea and high fever. â¢Staphylococcus aureus: Staph aureus produces a toxin that causes explosive vomiting. The disease may be considered a consequence of actual food poisoning from simply consuming the toxin, rather than from an actual infection. â¢Yersinia enterocolitica: Associated with raw milk and ice cream, among other foods, contamination is believed to be a consequence of a breakdown in sanitization and sterilization techniques at dairy processing facilities.
Science in action bitches! Bow down or be..... uhhh, bow or they will... uhh... be ignored I suppose.
When a family member was diagnosed with terminal cancer a few years ago I investigated every possible treatment I could find. I'd heard all the strories about how the pharmaceutical industry controls everything and that there were natural cures that were effective but "hidden" from the public. Through a medical researcher at a local university, I was able to speak to an oncologist in Cuba. Why Cuba? Because Cuba doesn't give a damn about pharmaceutical companies and would love to stick a thumb in those capitalist pigs' eyes. The Cuban oncologist told me that over the past 30 years Cuban doctors had tried every "natural" cancer remedy available. The only one that showed any promise was shark cartilage and even those results were marginal. When I asked her what are the most common forms of cancer treatment in Cuba today, she said: Surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Sound familiar?
Also, that Chavez chap went to Cuba and received exactly the treatment you outlined, not some esoteric mumbo jumbo. Reasonable to believe Cuba would give a friendly Head of State the very best they have.
New Study Sheds Light On Cancer-Protective Properties of Milk ScienceDaily (Oct. 3, 2012) â Milk consumption has been linked to improved health, with decreased risks of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and colon cancer. A group of scientists in Sweden found that lactoferricin4-14 (Lfcin4-14), a milk protein with known health effects, significantly reduces the growth rate of colon cancer cells over time by prolonging the period of the cell cycle before chromosomes are replicated. In a new study, investigators report that treatment with Lfcin4-14 reduced DNA damage in colon cancer cells exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light. Their results are published in the October issue of the Journal of Dairy Science®. "We previously hypothesized that the prolongation of the cell cycle in colon cancer cells as a result of Lfcin4-14 treatment may give the cells extra time for DNA repair," says one of the lead investigators, Professor Stina Oredsson, of the Department of Biology at the University of Lund, Sweden. "Indeed, UV light-induced damage was decreased in colon cancer cells treated with Lfcin4-14 compared with controls. The differences were small but significant." Investigators exposed colon cancer cells to UV light that caused DNA damage and then grew the cells in the absence or presence of Lfcin4-14. They evaluated DNA damage using a sensitive technique known as comet assay. After the cells are processed, the cells with DNA damage resemble a comet with a tail, and the intensity of the tail compared to the comet head indicates the number of DNA breaks. UV light exposure resulted in an increase in the number of comets while treatment with Lfcin4-14 reduced the number of comets in UV light-exposed cells. To understand the mechanism by which Lfcin4-14 reduced DNA damage, investigators evaluated the levels of several proteins involved in cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and cell death. They found an increase in flap endonuclease-1, a protein associated with DNA synthesis; a decrease in b-cell lymphoma 2-associated X protein, which is involved with cell death; and a decrease in the level of -H2AX, indicating more efficient DNA repair. "These changes in expression support our hypothesis that Lfcin4-14 treatment resulted in increased DNA repair," says Dr. Oredsson. Dr. Oredsson notes that cancer cells, in general, have defects in the DNA repair mechanisms. Thus, Lfcin4-14 may have a greater effect on normal cells than on cancer cells. "Our data suggest that the effects of Lfcin4-14 in prolonging the cell cycle may contribute to the cancer preventive effect of milk. This must be further investigated in different systems," she concludes. http://www.readability.com/read?url...ily+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Latest+Science+News%29 *** My comments: another reason to drink your whey
humans beyond infants do not need milk. even if this study were able to show benefits in human trials(doubtful) milk brings with it so many other unhealthy aspects it probably would not be worth it. the only reason so much milk is consumed in this country is because the dairy lobby has been so good at selling the "milk builds strong bones" calcium story. interesting data point. when we look at countries that consume the most dairy we find the highest osteoporosis rates so something isnt working. https://www.msu.edu/~corcora5/food/vegan/osteo.html http://foodmatters.tv/articles-1/the-truth-about-calcium-and-osteoporosis
Drink whey and you get most of the good benefits of milk, lactoferricin and high quality protein, calcium with none of the bad side effects. The positive effects of whey are way to long from me to list. I'm sure if you read up on this FT you will agree whey is a very healthy food.