Total bullshit. The 41 is only by an absurd criteria. By any reasonable measure the consensus is 97% or higher. Asshole. Come on jerm. Come right out and lie and tell us you don't believe it also. You disingenuous ideologically deranged piece of shit.
fraudcurrents lying again. go look at the papers some of them are in a link at the powell database. i posted a link on an earlier thread. if the papers really supported the consensus you could at least point to a database of a thousand of them. instead all you will find is a few papers discussing now failed models. Or you can just go to al gores whore cook himself... what only found about 60 papers but some of this were mis characterized.
Why are you even arguing? You yourself believes that man has caused most of the warming over the last 30 years. You'd have to be an idiot not to. I know you're not an idiot. Are you?
First of all there has been zero statistically measurable warming the last 17 to 20 years. The warming before that could have been caused by natural variability such as tides, sun, other forcings, man or other non co2 factors, natural co2. There is a chance the warming was causes by man made co2 but science has no way of telling right now. All the models saying it was man made co2 failed. At the moment science knows it is not good at modeling water vapor and clouds --- which are very important factors. now however when we bring the data we do have into consideration, we see that co2 levels trails change in ocean temps. you realize the agw nutters are most likely b.s. ing us. Highlights ⺠Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11â12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature. ⺠Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5â10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature. ⺠Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature. ⺠Changes in ocean temperatures explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980. ⺠Changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][/QUOTE] Why are you even arguing? You yourself believes that man has caused most of the warming over the last 30 years. You'd have to be an idiot not to. I know you're not an idiot. Are you? So you are an idiot or not? You seem to be arguing that you are and still posting irrelevant charts. For one thing, asshole, those are not even worldwide CO2 levels this is....
And you still cannot allow yourself to just flat out lie and say you don't believe that man has caused most of the warming over the last thirty years. Typical two faced slimey lawyer. Just say it. Yes or no douchebag.
My bet is with what NASA recently told us... CO2 is just like a thermostat. Or what I think ... co2 functions as insulation. And, that the initial layers keep warmth in and that after that adding co2 starts cooling by keeping more warming out. As CO2 thickens it starts reflecting more and more of the suns energy. But, that is just a guess based on my belief it must be a negative feedback type input because we have been cycling for millions of years. Right now science does not know. So if you ask me does co2 warm or cool in our current environment the only true answer is that science does not know.
As far as your chart goes. You yourself have posted many charts showing that the oceans are warming. So as the oceans warms co2 trails by a year. The dips in your chart... also trail the oceans by a year.