The difficulty in this is defining exactly what qualifies as ban worthy material. Also, you may run into selective enforcement issues. The racist will be racist, regardless of whether they are allowed to post here or not. Allowing them to post makes like a type of poll for us, based on the number of nicks posting racist material, and the frequency of the posts. This data gives some insight as to their current state of mind. It also lets the world (of ET viewers) see just how ignorant racists are. One of their goals is to rattle your cage. Like a baby loves a pacifier; they love doing that sort of shit. Don't give them the satisfaction: If you can't make them look stupid with an educated response; Or, If you can't make them look silly with a trollish response; Simply, Ignore them. They've likely had some childhood issues, and thrive on attention. So even just ignoring them has an effect.
What promises did he keep ? I see a lot of promises he didn't keep. He said he'd build a wall and Mexico would pay for it. He said US GDP growth would be 5-6% and it "would be easy". He said he'd create a new health care plan way better then the one that existed. He said he's lower personal taxes significantly ( did he ? you tell me is your effective personal tax rate higher or lower then 4 years ago ). He said he'd slash the US trading deficit with many countries. And I believe he said he'd do all this while reducing the federal deficit.
Sure, and when I got direct with them and rattled their cage they reported it to the site owner. Which got me thinking just how ridiculous this site was getting. Apparently railing about "blacks" and recommending a civil war solution is a-ok, but not if they personally are in the line of fire. Which of course makes the individual in question a coward who wants others to do the dirty work on their nasty agenda. But point taken as I've said in the past it's clear the site owner is quite alright with racist content and it's not worth my time opposing it.