And I still wonder why piehole goes to the least respected names in climate science (although Monckton is not even a scientist) while avoiding the 97% and the most obvious common sense science all while referring to a known denier site bought and paid for by the denier machine. Petterson, Salby and Monckton are like the three stooges of climate disinformation. You really have no interest in being objective do you piehole? Why? Are you and jerm related?
Seeing how apparently amazingly easy you find something likely to be correct, I won't make the vacuously snide remark (as all Lucrum's posts tend to be)... " if it's anti-AGW climate change...then you would". Thing is piezo ,what you are now suggesting is that it's not possible to use C-14 in the measurement of isotopic composition attributed to human emissions because somebody is questioning how quickly C-14 bomb residue diminishes. However that quite clearly goes on to direct attention to the decline which all of that shows to have continued after the end of the nuclear testing, additionally confirming the way a re-emergence from former high levels of man made enriched C-14 CO2 from the blasts in the atmosphere is accurately measured in ocean surface waters as depleted C-14 CO2, due to being away quite long enough for the significant marker C14 radioactive decay to occur. But I haven't even included or mentioned or taken as need for corroboration, any thermonuclear C-14 analysis or bern report, yet they are things being used for no good reason to argue against an ability to measure and distinguish anthropogenic emissions in the atmosphere. That is patently wrong. You don't rationally denounce the use of chalk because there is cheese! There are various sources of CO2. Each has a distinct signature or fingerprint. C-14 is one such unique signature. Never mind arguing the to and fro of what are the correct interpretations for trailing data after atmospheric thermonuclear spiking which is relying on C-14 to demonstrate the spike in the first place. It would require the refusal to accept basic hard core ongoing observational measurable science to deny the ratio of carbon isotopes in the atmosphere, in this case C-14 depleted CO2 within detailed continuous wide ranging sampling undertaken over decades. In one respect I agree with you.It is incorrect to blindly accept what gets reported as science but very well may not be. However throwing up vast quantities of irrelevant, incorrect ,contrary to basic knowledge disconnects, is one way not skeptics, but more precisely deniers like Salby for instance and certain blogs, obscure basic information and known fact. They in the least beg as many questions of skepticism equally against themselves, as they raise. The format for measuring how much anthropic CO2 in the carbon cycle through C-14 uses long standing basic fundamental classical physics. Basing work on things like the Suess effect for instance. There are no discrepancies in any way that counter such overwhelming observational findings soundly determining the values and ratios of atmospheric CO2 including the extremely large human one clearly and precisely identified within Earth's carbon cycle.
Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley is "a caricature English peer",[2] former deputy leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP)[3] and a climate change denier. He constitutes an excellent argument in favour of revolutionary socialism. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christopher_Monckton In his role as UKIP science spokesman, Monckton said that they would cut funding for climate science unless there arose "sufficient evidence" to change his mind. He also said that health risks associated with excessive salt consumption are merely "unjustifiable fears" and compared embryonic stem cell research to "the killing of very small children."[4] Monckton is a big promoter of the global warming conspiracy theory in which Barack Obama will cede US sovereignty to the United Nations, which will then enact a communist world government.[5] And this is the kind of guy you are looking at pie? Now I know why you are so confused.
dude, should ever I think you were right, I'd simply donate my body to the area of science that deals with psychotic delusion.
I see, so you admit you're one of those haughty closed minded holier than thou know it all types who think they're always right about everything all the time. IOW just what you accuse others of being when they disagree with you.