A bloody lip proves nothing. People willing to strap explosives on a child and point them into a civilian crowd would think nothing of bloodying a lip. If they, seriously, just abuse someone like Abu Graib, they should face charges - there is no excuse for that But true abuse must be PROVEN, not just taken on face value.
Just like the Obama/Holder show trial of ksm, I would bet this is, too. If the seals are found innocent, i would bet they would <i>not</i> be put back on the duty from which they came. They'd be allowed, wink wink, to retire or something. The fort hood incident confirmed that the top of the military, like Gates, has become pc obsessed rather than interested in the more pedestrian things like their troops safety, victory, etc.
The Islamist's terrorist name is Ahmed Hashim Abed. Abu Ghraib is the name of Baghdad Central Prison in Arabic, and it means'father of the raven' or 'Place of Ravens.'
I'm not surprised at all. When I was in jump school there were some SEAL's attending and they were nothing short of spectacular, esp with regard to unit cohesiveness. If one of them got gigged for boots not shined enough they all scuffed their own boots and went to the gig pit together.
... or Hussein may end up making his final bow face down prostrated in submission to Allah six feet under. It is virtually impossible to stop a trained and determined assassin with a public president as in the US.