Natural Language Processing

Discussion in 'App Development' started by 2weels, Jun 21, 2017.

  1. 2weels

    2weels

    Thanks!
     
    #31     Jun 28, 2017
  2. 2weels

    2weels


    Thank you. I will have to come back to this (I'm bookmarking it) when I understand charts a bit better.
     
    #32     Jun 28, 2017
  3. Sprout

    Sprout


    Prediction and Anticipation are two different things.

    Each grounded in two entirely different paradigms, experiences and results. One utilizes a full dataset, the other does not.

    Shifting to an event-based orientation vs a time-based one can open many conceptual doors.


    Past price action is the leading indicator of price

    OR

    Current Volume is the leading indicator of price.


    Is this true? Is this false?

    If we swap out OR for AND

    Is this true? Is this false?


    Discernment supports determining context.

    Determining context is a very supportive in sorting out truth.
     
    #33     Jun 28, 2017
  4. Sprout

    Sprout

    Two parallel lines are used to create a context.

    We use the parallelogram to bound price action.

    This creates "a line in the sand" where we know that we know the previous context is shifting into a new one as one of the lines of the parallelogram is crossed.

    Different paradigms of trading have different "lines in the sand"
     
    #34     Jun 28, 2017
  5. 2weels

    2weels

    Thanks Sprout. Still, I need a bit more background with TA (?) to make sense of this. Thanks for your efforts though. Perhaps you can recommend something for me to read to get this.

    Thanks again.
     
    #35     Jun 28, 2017
  6. Sprout

    Sprout

    Your welcome. I wish you success on your path.

    After reading most of the various highly recommended popular books on trading, applying those principals gave me the results that is typical of people deeply rooted in conventional wisdom.

    If the popular wisdom says that most traders will get washed out of this profession, than it stands to reason that what a majority of traders have their attention upon is not that great.

    My path of purposeful learning started by reading Jack Hershey's "Tomorrow's Newspaper Today" in the ET archives. Engaging in the process he describes as MADA transformed my understanding of the markets, my trading and the feelings I experience while doing so.

    One's fundamental understanding will be challenged. Frankly a lot of what I read I didn't understand at first. It was by engaging in the various exercises and drills that made the fundamental difference.

    The mighty HB pencil, ruby red eraser, 3-ring binders of thread printouts will increase your understanding! Making money is a by-product.

    Jack promotes thinking.

    Thinking through concepts can be very illuminating.

    Open minds will derive much knowledge.


    Closed minds are like broken records - the tune doesn't change very much.
     
    #36     Jul 1, 2017
    2weels likes this.
  7. 2weels

    2weels

    Thank you very much for this Sprout. I will be looking into this.

     
    #37     Jul 1, 2017
  8. dumpdapump

    dumpdapump

    #38     Jul 2, 2017
  9. 2weels

    2weels

    Thanks much. I'm not surprised. I wonder what the relationship is between single traders and institutional trading. These firms use a lot of money to hire programmers and experts in AI/ML, but in the end it doesn't seem like they necessarily have a monopoly on strategy ideas. But it's a bit daunting.
     
    #39     Jul 2, 2017