Nationwide study finds no significant link between in-person schooling and COVID infection rates

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TreeFrogTrader, Jan 5, 2022.

  1. #11     Jan 5, 2022
  2. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    Here's most of the real reason and why the sheep image of you was appropriate as you'll buy anything the government is selling--

    ---Children are less likely to have conditions like obesity and diabetes, which increase the likelihood of severe Covid-19. But biology is at play too. Kids' nasal passages appear to contain less of the ACE2 receptor that the coronavirus uses to get into cells, and airway cells show differences that may prime them to detect the virus early.---
     
    #12     Jan 5, 2022
  3. FACT:

    Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that several personal protective and social measures, including handwashing, mask wearing, and physical distancing are associated with reductions in the incidence covid-19.
    https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj-2021-068302
     
    #13     Jan 5, 2022

  4. Now you are changing the subject because you got embarrassed.

    I said transmissions are lower in schools due to masks, social distancing and cleaning protocols.

    Yopu posted a fucktarded sheep image.

    I showed data that proves transmissions are lower in schools due to mitigating measures.

    Now you are citing some bullshit about children have less conditions.

    We are talking about transmissions and spread among children and teachers.

    You are too stupid to even argue with... government is not selling it.. science is.
     
    #14     Jan 5, 2022
  5. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    -----The mathematical modeling of virus transmission within households found that people age 20 and younger were 43% "as susceptible" to COVID-19 compared to those older than 20-------people 20 and younger have viral loads -- the amount of coronavirus in their bodies -- estimated at 63% lower than what adults carry, which affects the likelihood they are to spread COVID-19 to others.
     
    #15     Jan 5, 2022
  6. Please... you quote random shit from the internet.. I gave you various medical sources that did actual STUDIES.. not mathematical modeling..
     
    #16     Jan 5, 2022
  7. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    One thing I don't do is sidestep and change the subject, The truth of the matter is that schoolkids are much less likely to catch and spread the virus. Masks,"vaccines" and so called social distancing play no part.
     
    #17     Jan 5, 2022
  8. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    Nice try but you'll accept anything the government tells you. The rest of us use common sense, facts and science.
     
    #18     Jan 5, 2022
  9. claiming you dont sidestep while changing the subject at issue is exactly what you are doing...... wonder why no one has jumped to your defense.... because you are full of shit.

    COVID is an airborne virus...... even a fucktarded child knows you reduce spread when you reduce liklihood of sharing of airborne particles.
     
    #19     Jan 5, 2022

  10. I quoted you science... not the government.



    you are digging a deeper holw for your stupidity.... I will listen to anyone else come inon this and debate using science rather than FOX news.
     
    #20     Jan 5, 2022