What I get is all the same stupid-ass whining occurred in the first two years of Clinton's Admin. You'd have thought his tax increase, which closed the deficit over time, was the end of the world or something. The actual result was eight years of prosperity before Dubya screwed up everything. There is zero proof that the approach you're advocating, which seems to be a combination of nonsensically beating up on Obama for raising the deficit while at the same time wanting the not-paid-for Bush tax cuts to continue (you do realize they were set to expire precisely because they're not paid for? Probably not, it's never mentioned by the folks wanting to have them continued.) has already been proven, over the eight years of Bush, to be a loser. You may now continue your name-calling. Libtard, socialist, whatever.
Dubya screwed up everything? Explain these, welfare boy: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2920328#post2920328 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2920332#post2920332 There's plenty of proof that Obama's socialist welfare state agenda isn't working. There's zero proof that cutting government spending would work? Because that's what I'm advocating. We (who still pay taxes) are taxed more than enough already.
When you stop the name calling, I'll answer. I am actually interested in debating this stuff, but I've had more than enough of not just your BS, but everyone else's as well. You guys seem to think that ad hominems are a proper form of argumentation, for some reason. I guess it's an improvement on threatening bodily harm, but it gets tiresome.
Piling on debt is a BAD THING..especially for consumption... regardless of who or what is behind it. Bush did the country wrong. Obama is doing us MUCH worse...
I hope they let all the tax cuts expire so we can finally balance the budget and get this economy going.
Your stock libtard lies (like blaming everything on Bush) are getting tiresome too. And who threatened bodily harm? I sure didn't.
No you didn't threaten bodily harm. That was done by others about a year ago, and all of the culprits are on my ignore list. But you couldn't answer without throwing in another "libtard", could you? Ad hominem (you don't even know me, but you feel free to insult me with every post) <> valid argument. You might want to tell that to your friends on the right, none of whom seem capable of even a shred of civility.
Yeah, OK, sure, change the subject and run away because you can't address my points: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2919673#post2919673