National Emergency

Discussion in 'Politics' started by vanzandt, Jan 7, 2019.

  1. piezoe

    piezoe

    Actually, I am not a lawyer. I just play one on Elite Trader. :D

    I recommend not reading my posts. Someone with your intellect could be easily misled by them.
     
    #81     Jan 8, 2019
  2. UsualName

    UsualName

    Wrong. You numbers are not correct. The truth is there is no way to accurately determine how many people crossthe border each year. Our best estimates are based on apprehensions but that has changed significantly since a growing of border crossers are now women and children seeking asylum who intend to get apprehended.

    At its height somewhere around 2002 to 2007 we were apprehending over one million, hence where frog is getting his numbers from, but we’ve seen about an 80 percent drop since then for a number of reasons including economic factors, which include less Mexican nationals coming to America than other Central Americans, and improved border security.
     
    #82     Jan 8, 2019
  3. You a play a fool too. And are quite good at it.

    The lawyer thing- not so much.
     
    #83     Jan 8, 2019
  4. piezoe

    piezoe

    Thank you. Why not give me a couple well deserved 'likes' then?
     
    #84     Jan 8, 2019
    TJustice and TreeFrogTrader like this.
  5. Sorry Cowboy. That is not going to work with me. I stand by my numbers and assertions 100%.

    I said that there have been at least 50,000 a month known apprehensions on the border based on border patrol data.

    Let's review three recent months just to sanity check that, shall we?

    September- 50,568
    October- 60,772
    November- 62,456

    Months will vary but let us just agree that my 50,000 month statement was reasonable even though your trance state will keep you from doing so.

    From there we refer to the Border Patrols consistent testimony to Congress, in reports, and elsewhere that they only capture about half or less of the illegals at the border. (visa overstays do not come into this discussion but they are another major, major pantload). Again, for the rest of you, who are not in a lefty trance state- do the math and tell me how my assertion of 1,000,000 a year is looking.

    The Tard tries to crabwalk away by apparently saying that because the exact number cannot be known that we cannot count the ones that have not been apprehended.

    You know, up until about six or seven months ago, the government consistently reported that the number of illegals in the country was 11 million. Then we woke up one day and that number had been revised upward to 22 million. Do your own googling to confirm what I said because it is true.

    So you ask yourself - how the hell can you wake up one day and suddenly conclude that the number is 100% higher than you thought? Look no further than the tard logic used above to see how that can happen.

    Done.

    And yes, I have the border data right here in front of me. Go look it up yourself.
     
    #85     Jan 8, 2019
  6. UsualName

    UsualName

    You’re looking at an unsourced Wikipedia entry.
     
    #86     Jan 8, 2019
  7. .


    Is this something you want to wager on?

    Viewers should prepare for the usual.
     
    #87     Jan 8, 2019
  8. UsualName

    UsualName

    #88     Jan 8, 2019

  9. No. Not looking at wiki on the monthly illegal count. Let me know if you want to wager on that.


    On the 11 million versus 22 million issue, I dont stand by that - just watching it play out and being challenged. It confirms my assertion though that there are challenges to the lowballing of the numbers. Whether the government is right or yale's challenge to it. I dont know.

    https://thehill.com/latino/407848-y...-not-11-million-undocumented-immigrants-in-us

    What the Border Patrol reported for apprehensions, I do know. Let me know if you want to wage on that. I dont want to take all your food stamps though. I am compassionate kind of guy so dont risk anything you can't afford to lose.
     
    #89     Jan 8, 2019
  10. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Paul Manafort shared confidential polling data related to the 2016 presidential campaign with Konstantin Kilimnik, Kilimnik is linked to Russian military intelligence. "The GRU Guy." Coordination between a Trump campaign official and the Russian government. A pathway by which the Russians could have access to Trump campaign data. Manafort's filing also acknowledges he met with Kilimnik in Madrid while he worked on Trump's presidential campaign. That would now total three known meetings Manafort had with Kilimnik during the campaign.
     
    #90     Jan 8, 2019