Hey Maverick: Certainly can't help but acknowledge your experience and skill in the markets, but I have to take a little issue here with this comment; "I've always laughed at the Sharpe Ratio as a way of measuring risk for a fund." Dr. Sharpe shared a Nobel prize for his work in CAPM, with Markowitz and Merton Miller if memory serves. I realize you have a great depth of experience..Perhaps you like to tell us about your Nobel prize(s). I am sure you must have won at least once. I used Sharpe ratio in my business pretty successfully. Like Black-Scholz equation, it has its limitations, but in general it allows us to put an effective face on risk and it has kept me (and many others) out of trouble for more than a decade. Steve
interesting, dr. obviously you are on his email list, this isn't just a purely random occurrence.... or is it.....? surfer:eek:
The revelation and the reality that chance plays in day to day life isn't anything new. Taleb merely gives another point of view amongst a sea of voices that exist today. I agree that many investors/traders really don't realize their exact risk exposure and sometimes kid themselves about this reality. At the end of the day it's all how you use this perspective, and how it helps one navigate the markets/life at large. The only problem I have with Taleb as well as Niederhoffer is that they adhere to their views with unflappable rigidity bordering upon an almost religious fanaticism or quest. Taleb (indelibly influenced by his past life experiences), chaos and uncertainty swirls about constantly and if you think you have a definite edge, you are only kidding yourself. Taleb's edge seems to almost lie in the fact that he acknowledges the fact that having a definite edge is near impossible (fooling ourselves due to the nature of random events). As soon as we are comfortable in the fact that we have acquired some knowledge, the world will inevitably smack you down and make you rethink your "edge". He places his positions and waits for the chaos to happen, hopefully being well positioned and catching the move. An analogy of surfing is pretty apt when I think about Taleb. Its like he's going surfing day in and day out and letting the majority of waves pass him by while all the other surfers evaluate each wave as they come and take those that they want. Taking opportunities as they present themselves. Taleb, on the other hand, passes up a lot of waves in hopes of catching a tsunami. As long as he can wait in control of himself he will profit eventually. I find his investment style very interesting and I'm sure he's very successful with it. But, at the end of the day, it's just one point of view. The idea of "markets" and "marketplace" is an elastic idea in my opinion. Marketplaces are resilient beyond almost human comprehension, and adherence to a single point of view with plastic rigidity is a mistake in my opinion. The world works too hard at putting each of us into a neat box, labeling us in order to deal with and understand each of us better. I try to resist the tendency of the human nature's propensity towards laziness by remaining open, pliable. Just through simple observation of the game of poker and its players one can see that the most successful players are those that can change and adapt their methods as they see fit as the game progresses. Too often the player with a "system" is the one that finds themselves, in the long run, defeated because the other player that has adapted his/her game accordingly has overcome the rigidity of the others system. The key is to acquire the vast knowledge and discipline necessary in order to become the player that can identify the actions of those around them in order to overcome the enacted "systems". Knowing how to play the cards one is dealt correctly is only half the game. I enjoy Taleb and also find him intriguing, but at the end of the day, his is just but another one of many ways of looking at the same thing. The living, breathing, ever expanding and contracting world of the marketplace. Just my .02 of course.
Steve, It can only be effective if used as a relative measure of risk. The problem with the Sharp Ratio is not that it's worthless or meaningless or that Dr. Sharpe did not deserve the credit he got for it. The problem is that its like a transsexual. Nice legs, lipstick, blonde hair, but what's underneath? The sharpe ratio tells you nothing about the truly hidden risks of the fund. And it lulls people into complacency regarding what's really underneath that "skirt" so to speak. The other negative about the Sharpe Ratio is like anything else, the hedge fund world has found ways to manipulate it to their advantage. Hence the preponderance of index premium selling funds out there that advertise very high sharpe ratios. I assure you, those risks are being dramatically underplayed. I have seen first hand how traders can manipulate their sheets and their performance numbers and I have seen first hand the consequences of doing that. I think Taleb explains the weakness of the Sharpe ratio better then I can so I encourage you to read his articles concerning the subject.
thank you for the cogent reply. JWH sharpe ratios have been abysmal yet the trend followers seem to overlook this fact..... instead pointing to his personal success. when i was taking art history in school, my professor stressed to never judge a painting, or any art for that matter based on your opinion of the moral qualities of the artist. can the same be said for money managers?? as a firm's manager, are you able to share the percentage of traders that find success with your firm, and what personal qualities to you look for when hiring ( or is track record the sole arbiter of the decision) ? do you believe luck is involved in your hiring decisions--any stories you can share would be cool. surfer
Quote from Maverick74: For those of you that read the Trader Monthly article or the one in Active Trader, the articles weren't so much about him, but rather about the fallacy of historical performance as it relates to determining the risk of an individual trader or fund. I find this area of finance fascinating, especially in light of the 12,000 or so hedge funds out there. I've always laughed at the Sharpe Ratio as a way of measuring risk for a fund. Or the min and max drawdowns that funds like to advertise. They tell you nothing about a fund. Well, that's not entirely true. Bad numbers certainly reveal many red flags, but the problem is, good numbers don't necessarily mean the fund is any better. Taleb spends a lot of time explaining the difference between evaluating how risky a fund has been in the past vs how risky it could be going forward. As an options trader myself, I have a very intimate understanding and respect for risk. And since I now run an office and have to look at new traders and their risk profiles, it's fascinating to see how dangerous they are, yet how well they hide it. I can see through the BS pretty fast. What's even more amazing is they don't even realize they are BSing me. They really truly do not see their own risk and they are completely ignorant of it. I see a lot of that on ET. This is one of the reasons I found Taleb's "Fooled By Randomness" book so interesting. It forces us to look beyond our own reflection in the mirror and instead think about what our reflection could look like in a different time and under different circumstances. I think many of us are scared to really admit, that luck plays a much larger factor in our lives then we care to admit, especially with trading. Because with luck as a variable, we have to come to terms with the fact that we do not have as much control as think we do, it's really quite scary if you think about it. If any of you get the chance to see the new Woody Allen film "Match Point", it focuses on the role luck plays in our everyday lives and how little control we really have. I look forward to Taleb's new book "Black Swans" as it will go more into how luck plays a role in society as a whole vs just the trading environment. _________________________________________________ Good post Maverick. I am curious, what sort of things do you look for when evaluating traders? I have thought as well, that the historical draw downs, sharpe ratio's, etc are not quite enough to really get a full picture. I think i can tend to be a bit paranoid about some of the risks, likely becuase i trade super volatile micro-caps :eek: I liked your post as well about the managers/traders that have never had a big draw down and how they will react when/if it happens...but obviously we would all rather prepare for and mitigate those eventual bigger than plan draw downs. I have to say, that is something i worry about ....maybe more than i should, but the possibility of a massive collapse in multiple of my positions at once....like a huge 20+% sudden drop in most of my long positions....ouch.
Way OT but yes, she did make it just about watchable. Nice hair, lipstick etc. but what's underneath? LOL Seriously though, she has talent and promise. Let's see if she screws it up.
It happened to me several times and I was fortunate to pull out it of unharmed. It will happen to everyone at one point or another. If you have a solid well thought out plan and most importantly a good edge, you'll make it just fine.
"Past results are no guarantee for future performance". But still, betting (sensibly and consistently) on winners offers a higher probability of success.
That would be unfair to Mr. Taleb if only because the combine value of accounts that I manage is orders of magnitude smaller than his. Somehow Nassim Talib's scare mongering reminds me that of a sleazy televangelist's crowing about the Rapture to scare up some change from senior citizens. Besides, he can not keep his story straight. So, which of the above statements is the truth? Does NT hate trading, or find it pleasurable?