Name-calling Moderators

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by Random.Capital, Jul 12, 2011.

  1. You do understand, of course, that this thread is about the conduct of moderators whose job it is to moderate as compared to regular members, or even sponsors, such as they are. Now then, would you like a digestive biscuit with your teabag? :p
     
    #11     Jul 14, 2011
  2. Well then, let's hope that history repeats itself in this instance, eh? Just to be fair and equitable, of course.
     
    #12     Jul 14, 2011
  3. bone

    bone

    The term 'Libitard' is quite moderate. Therefore, the moderator was indeed moderate.
     
    #13     Jul 14, 2011
  4. By FOX standards? To be sure.
     
    #14     Jul 14, 2011
  5. bone

    bone

    [​IMG]
     
    #15     Jul 14, 2011
  6. Joe

    Joe

    Gabfly1,
    I think you have a misconception of where moderators come from. If you notice they usually have over 1,000+ posts. This is because they are members who participate regularly; they have expressed a desire to help us eliminate spam or members who grossly violate our terms of service and we have seen that their temperament is within acceptable levels of good conduct. They volunteer for the position, but it does not remove their rights as members, just gives them additional privileges to be our eyes and take pre-set available actions to help clean up the site.
     
    #16     Jul 14, 2011
  7. bone

    bone

    Sheer brilliance.
     
    #17     Jul 14, 2011
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Boy you're not kidding.
     
    #18     Jul 14, 2011
  9. libtard?

    is that anything like moronic take it in the ass self hating twats?
     
    #19     Jul 16, 2011
  10. Nice.

    A thread about rude site moderators brings out rude site sponsors.

    Birds of a feather, I guess.

    Way to stay classy, ET.
     
    #20     Jul 16, 2011