My Options Play

Discussion in 'Options' started by Multioption, Oct 3, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pattersb

    pattersb Guest

    nay ...

    I do contract programming work, my last project ended, and I decided to build my own software in the hopes of finding entry points.... entry points = anamolies ... (stocks move sharply out of their trading ranges, ... so the theory goes)

    That was my funny money (not all that funny actually) .... I started with 10k, lost it ... argh, but it was offset by investment profits, fed another 5k into the account and that's down to 4k....

    Yeah, I need to get some paying work and do some serious studying on the side ;)
     
    #1471     Mar 23, 2006
  2. Update:

    Bought yesterday 3 SNDK May 62.50 Call @ 2.65
    Bought today 25 LCAV June 50 Call @ 2.55

    Will add more positions.

    Caveat: I'm experimeting OTM options!
     
    #1472     Mar 23, 2006
  3. cnms2

    cnms2

    In the beginning most of us thought that trading is much easier, and most of us were humbled by the market. As you had to spend years to acquire your programming skills, so trading requires. Acknowledge that you don't know yet how to trade options, keep learning without throwing money to the market, paper trade, then start very small with real money, and build your own niche. Learn what money management is and apply it religiously.

    Check these links:
     
    #1473     Mar 23, 2006
  4. wabrew

    wabrew

    Pattersb: listen to what cnms2 has to say. He is so... right.

    On his '38 steps' post, I think I am now at about step 28,... and I have been trading (investing) for 40 years.
     
    #1474     Mar 23, 2006
  5. novel20

    novel20

    wabrew, how long do you think you would need to reach step 37? :D 40 more years?
     
    #1475     Mar 23, 2006
  6. pattersb

    pattersb Guest

    thanks for the tips and encouragement. I'll definitely review the 28 points. I need to take this far more seriously. (Or perhaps less so ....)

    I have an interview tomorrow for a real-job.... WOW! What a great job market! Best in years .... VERY BULLISH SIGN

    I'd appreciate any thoughts on this strategy, (at least one of them) My thinking is this: Prices do Not have to go back up, but they Must go down... So I look for big movements up, and then a top. Probably not a very novel approach, but

    I was strongly considering buying 10 April ITW puts @ 2.75 today
    was watching it all week. STN also.
     
    #1476     Mar 23, 2006
  7. wabrew

    wabrew

    You gotta read the 38 points and spend more time learning the basics of investing/trading. The above statement tells me you need to put your checkbook back in your pocket until you have a better understanding of and feel for the market..
     
    #1477     Mar 23, 2006
  8. hillary will take away your exhuberance.........
     
    #1478     Mar 23, 2006
  9. pattersb

    pattersb Guest


    way ahead of you ;) I'm probably at step 15. Take a breather, and do some feasiblity work ...

    I suppose the up/down analysis was a gross simplification. Is it true, that often enough, as fast as buyers run up the price sellers drive it back down? I'm looking for "unjustified run-ups", stocks that are trending downward that move sharply out of the trading ranges on little-or-no-news.

    For instance, FNM on 2/23 has been the one trade I've made that actually meets my rules. (discpline is definitely a virtue..) The broader markets where trending down, FNM gapped up, on news that was not as bad as expected, but still bad.

    Suddenly puts were extremely cheap, Mar 55 puts went to .40, I bought 20 ... whent to 2.40 in three days. If I can find 50 similiar situations a year...

    I won't but still I consider shorting OSTK, today. volume's drying up and the news sounds mostly bad ... yet it's up 40% for the week.
     
    #1479     Mar 24, 2006
  10. SNDK uptrend will be established around 58.50/59.00. Will update if/when I add to my positions.
     
    #1480     Mar 24, 2006
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.