My next motherboard

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by nitro, Feb 21, 2004.

  1. nitro

    nitro

    Hello nononsense,

    The use of Quantum Mechanics was not meant to be taken literally. It was a metaphor.

    nitro
     
    #41     Feb 22, 2004
  2. OK nitro, I know you meant it that way!

    Good luck with your project. Keep telling us about it.

    nononsense
     
    #42     Feb 22, 2004
  3. nitro

    nitro

    Prophet,

    Once again, thanks for the very useful links.

    Please try again on the PM.

    nitro
     
    #43     Feb 22, 2004
  4. No matter what you choose you should stick with Opteron and AMD
    " internal HP benchmarks compariing their 3.2GHz Xeon server to their new Opteron Proliant servers. 1P and 2P configurations were shown, and even the 1P Opteron beat the 2P Xeon in Webbench.

    For dual processor configurations, the ProLiant DL145 server with
    the ProLiant DL140 server using 3.2GHz Intel Xeon processors
    processor configurations, the ProLiant DL145 with 2.2GHz outperformed
    using 3.2GHz Intel Xeon processors by an average of 44%.

    Keep in mind that this is 32 bit here. Now with 64 bit AMD has more of an advantage which they will lose when Intel goes 64 bit, but they still retain the architectural advantage. "


    http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/benchmarks/dl145-webbench.pdf
     
    #44     Feb 26, 2004
  5. nitro

    nitro

    Intel has aleady "gone" 64-bit. It's called Itanium-2.

    http://www.intel.com/products/serve...x.htm?iid=ipp_browse+featureprocess_itanium2&

    The neat thing is, the 64-bit Opterons will run existing 32-bit apps natively, whereas the Itanum2 CPU's "simulate" 32 bits apps, and it is MUCH slower than the Opteron on 32-bit code. Not sure what the benchmarks are when they are going head to head on 64-bits...

    I agree though, that performance/$, AMD has hit the jackpot, and they will only get better and better.

    nitro
     
    #45     Feb 26, 2004
  6. That's not my writing, it was from a hardware website guy who assumes you know the difference between mainstream Xeon's and Itaniums(X-86 instructions maybe, no that would be too obvious, but this is Elite) . That's why the comparison with Opterons and Xeon's.
     
    #46     Feb 26, 2004
  7. #47     Mar 2, 2004
  8. nitro

    nitro

    Very interesting.

    Thanks for the link.

    nitro
     
    #48     Mar 2, 2004
  9. nitro

    nitro

    I got work from Tyan that they will be coming out with a barebones system that includes this MB for about $3000 (I am hopeful less.) That means that after you add four Opterons, the HDs, and the memory, you will be at about $8,000.

    Not bad for a state of the art quad system.

    nitro
     
    #49     Mar 14, 2004
  10. rally

    rally


    The price of the motherboard on it's own is very attractive for a quad compared to a quad xeon board:

    http://www.alvio.com/pmoreinfo.asp?iid=2992

    Also tyan now have the full spec of the board on their site now:

    http://www.tyan.com/products/html/thunderk8qs.html
     
    #50     Mar 20, 2004