OK, since I am often times on both sides of this particular area of possible mis-interpretation, I would like to throw in a couple of notes. When we "teach" and/or offer training, it is very important that we not be taken out of context. A classic case of "a little bit of knowledge is dangerous". Many times there are caveats or conditions that apply to methods being outlined. Many read this as "they want to sell us something (school, book, "system" or something), and rightly so in many cases. This "baiting" is irritating, and traders should be cynical. In some rare cases (I would like to think in my case...at least I am sincere when I say it)...we need time to explain the details to consider when making trades. I cannot teach anyone to trade...but I can teach them trading...and there is a big difference. This is the reason that I want specifics in the test that I am running for the chat rooms and other stock picking services. Because the caveats also offer an "out" to the "pickers" they make the "picks" of a much lower value. Tony OZ or any other good trader would probably make money using any valid strategy or system, while others trying to use the same system would fail. I doubt that we will find a fool proof system, and since the market is always throwing curves at us, we must not take anything as 100%. (back to the test)...We only have a few days for others who want to be included. Specifics only, and will do my best to execute them with diligence. We aren't looking for "fool proof" - but I would like to see successful percentages and profits from some of the service providers. Happy New Year