The nature of your argument suggests that you may well be a direct descendant of those plants that you so dearly love.
Weren't you guys trying to save the rain forests awhile back ? What happened to your concern for plants since then ?
I am assuming that your posts in this thread are tongue-in-cheek. And if that is indeed the case, then I am smiling along with you, and urge you not to click on the following hyperlink. However, if by some remote chance you actually do believe what you have written, then I cordially invite you to pull my finger: http://www.barbneal.com/wav/ltunes/Bugs/Bugs34.wav
Ten minutes. that makes you one of the more technically educated global warming experts on your side of the isle. I loved the part where they show Al Gore and a big giant chart showing the correlation between co2 and global warming and then the guy points out that the warming leads the co2. For the non technical people here that means that the co2 can not cause the warming. Then there is the correlation between solar activity and planetary temperature pointed out there. Is anyone aware that all the planets in our solar system are currently warming??? That also means, for the technically illiterate, and most hysterical people are technically illiterate, that our co2 is not causing the warming. The earth is up .6 degrees over decades, next it will break out in flames, wake up and pee everybody!!
Just another distractor post. Clearly, you haven't read the expose's of this flick that were linked in the thread. Why not go back and link them and then come and defend the flick then? Anyway, there have been a number of studies done to show that solar warming does not account for more than a fraction of the global warming we have seen. That particular factoid is just wrong -- it's also another talking point from the conservative side that I have seen before. Why not do a bit of research, think about the issue a bit, and add some value when you post, hmmm?
The globes climate changes over such a long period of time. Any substantial climatic changes would probably not happen until far into the future. I am certainly not an expert but I have heard so many different theories and discussions on this topic that I could not really give an accurate depiction of what will happen but i'm sure that all the man-made gas emissions are not helping the situation. If the climate is changing beyond natural variations then we will have to put restrictions on industrial activity as well as other things.
this is infact correct, i dont know what's there to argue. u may still think there's a reason why co2 lags and that it still contributing but its true it lags overall. also the whole solar system is heating up including pluto, mars has even developed another huge hurricane stain in the surface. so solar system is bloody warming and sustantially. u may argue that that alone aint enough to have warmed the earth so much but it is pretty hard to reconcile with slum dunk man made gW.
Um... No it's not hard to reconcile. You just do the math. The difference is large. That's why people are getting nervous. Really, if you want to discuss it "intelligently" spend a bit of time researching the facts of the matter. I had this argument out about 6 months ago with my dad and had to take a look at all the same recycled claims we are seeing in this thread.
of course it is hard to reconcile, if all planets are warming means there's a pattern, and that the sun is playing a part....maybe the only part. i dont know. since u did the necessary research, how much of a difference is there between changes in earth's temps and mars or other plantes.