Must see: The Great Global Warming Swindle

Discussion in 'Politics' started by just21, Mar 12, 2007.

  1. atozcom

    atozcom

    My analogy is really about the complexity of the natural global weather system. A global weather system model is essentially a computer program with man made, man set parameters.

    There will never be enough user set parameters in a computer program to duplicate the complexity of a global nature system.

    Trading system, any trading system is not as complex as the global weather system.

    Actually an apple falls in an predictable manner.

    Newton's first law: I. Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it.

    The apple will fall in a straight line unless out side act on by outside force. Wind would cause the apple to fall off sided. Gravitation acceleration would cause the apple to fall faster and faster.

    Newton's second law. The relationship between an object's mass m, its acceleration a, and the applied force F is F = ma.

    The force when the apple hit the ground will be the mass of the apple times the gravitational acceleration.

    Now the manner how the apply travel when it falls:

    u=initial velocity
    v= final velocity
    a=gravitation acceleration (32ft/sec/sec or 9.8m/sec/sec)
    t=time
    S= displacement (how far the object travelled)

    Final speed v when the apple hit the ground can be found

    v=u + at

    All other value can be derive from this two equations.

    v=u + at
    s=((u + v)/2)*t

    Not really that comlicated.
     
    #221     Apr 13, 2007
  2. neophyte321

    neophyte321 Guest


    I hate to burst your bubble ... wind is dependant on the WEATHER! Which is dependant on climate Forcasts!

    The same models you are questioning!

    :)

    you are definitely on the right track my friend!
     
    #222     Apr 13, 2007
  3. atozcom

    atozcom

    Dear Mr. neophyte321 Simpleton:

    You are so simple minded. No wonder you believe in the GW garbage.

    I said wind is a factor that would affect the fall of an apple as an example of external force in the Newton's first law of motion.

    A falling apple has nothing to do with a weather system and has nothing to do with Global warming. The mere mention of "wind" have nothing to the with Global Warming or weather system.

    Sorry. I have no bubble for you to burst.
     
    #223     Apr 13, 2007
  4. Cesko

    Cesko

    the real astonishing thing is that one should somehow assume
    the science community as such is somehow better in terms
    of interaction than, let's say, they average day trading board's
    chit chat section ... but these guys really shoot what they have.
    fraud and idiocy, false and nonsense, bugs ... what have you. it's
    like with this other thing, 911, once the stakes are high enough
    the science community is like the average midwest bar when
    drinks are free ... manners slightly deteriorating over time.

    WTF does that mean????

    about this planet in a different way. and i think it will not harm
    3world countries, since in the course of shifting economic thinking
    to sustainability will include shifting awareness of these countries
    either. economy has to be taken out of the hands of a few reckless
    individuals. and economy is willing to do so, just look at buffet
    and gates, though they are extreme examples in every way. the
    10% chance i give your position does not justify the bet. .....

    WTF does this mean????

    sometimes mouth and fingertips are faster than brain cells
    What a hell this mean????

    no matter how much strange third world
    arguments people try to come up with. we need to care more
    about this planet. period.


    And what this is supposed to mean??

    Man I start feeling sorry for you and I am not joking.Talking of Earth are you from this planet???
     
    #224     Apr 13, 2007
  5. man

    man

    really? and i thought he was a physicist. and not a biologist
    or climatologist. so wrong one can be ...
     
    #225     Apr 16, 2007
  6. man

    man

    hm. if you had asked in a slightly more polite way i would
    have written my thoughts in a slightly easierToRead way.
    so that those who should be in bed already get it too.

    considering that you seem to be from this planet i
    seriously doubt i am from the same. nevertheless
    if there is anything you do not get about this very
    post, please, ... just ask a little more ... polite?

    thnx, dear. and ... do not worry what all these people
    around are saying about you. just ... don't.
     
    #226     Apr 16, 2007
  7. man

    man

    cesko, see, it is very rare that a non serious comic
    like myself finds the absolute perfect idiot. but indeed,
    you ... are. and that quote above ... really, rare as
    can be. keep it going, big one.

    Cesko, Cesko, that is too much. "What a hell this mean?"
     
    #227     Apr 16, 2007
  8. man

    man

    that is my Cesko. feeling sorry for me ... and "not joking"!.
     
    #228     Apr 16, 2007
  9. Cesko

    Cesko

    You got me here I have to give it to you, the thing is I am not used to read your posts real careful anymore. So congratulation!

    Imagine me in fetal position licking my wounds from you(of all people)
     
    #229     Apr 16, 2007