Muslim Women Exempted From TSA Screening?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Trader666, Nov 21, 2010.

  1. EDITORIAL: Terrorists hiding in hijabs
    Muslims seek special treatment to elude TSA groping

    7:04 p.m., Wednesday, November 17, 2010

    Note to terrorists: Next time, wear a hijab. The Department of Homeland Security reportedly is giving special exemptions to their "enhanced pat-down" policy to Muslim women wearing the hijab or other form-concealing garments.

    Last week, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued a "travel advisory" noting that women who are patted down "should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down." It's unclear why CAIR believes TSA frisking must be Shariah-compliant. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano refused to deny that such exemptions existed when CNS News asked her about them on Monday, saying instead that "adjustments will be made where they need to be made" and that "there will be more to come" on this issue.

    A fatwa issued in February by Islamic scholars at the Fiqh Council of North America forbad observant Muslims from going through full-body scanners. The council stated, "It is a violation of clear Islamic teachings that men or women be seen naked by other men and women. Islam highly emphasizes modesty and considers it part of faith. The Quran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts." The alternative to the highly revealing and intrusive body scanners is the similarly invasive pat-down, which is objectionable to everyone regardless of religion. Reports of TSA officers placing their hands inside peoples' pants and conducting full skin-to-skin frisks have only heightened the general sense of disgust at this unprecedented government intrusion.

    Exemptions for Muslim women wearing traditional garb may be the brainchild of Mohamed Elibiary, who recently was made a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council. Mr. Elibiary is president and chief executive officer of the Texas-based Freedom and Justice Foundation and a self-styled "de-radicalization expert" whose star has risen during the Obama presidency. He previously was appointed to Homeland Security's Countering Violent Extremism Working Group and has testified before Congress as an expert on Muslim radicalism - a topic he seems to know well.

    In December 2004, Mr. Elibiary spoke at a conference honoring the life and works of the "great Islamic visionary," Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. In 2008, Mr. Elibiary denounced the conviction of Hamas-connected members of the Holy Land Foundation for material support of terrorism. Most alarmingly, Mr. Elibiary is an admirer of the work of Sayyid Qutb, the intellectual and spiritual godfather of modern jihadism. Mr. Elibiary argues that Qutb is greatly misunderstood. "Many Westerners who've read Qutb's and many others' work," Mr. Elibiary wrote, "see the potential for a strong spiritual rebirth that's truly ecumenical allowing all faiths practiced in America to enrich us and motivate us to serve God better by serving our fellow man more."

    No one who has read Qutb's work can mistake it for anything but an all-out assault on the American way of life and a call for a global Islamic takeover. The 9/11 Commission noted Qutb's role as an inspiration to al Qaeda and concluded that, "No middle ground exists in what Qutb conceived as a struggle between God and Satan. All Muslims - as he defined them - therefore must take up arms in this fight. Any Muslim who rejects his ideas is just one more nonbeliever worthy of destruction." Qutb - who lived in the United States as a student in the late 1940s - developed a comprehensive anti-American ideology that's widely cited as the basis for the contemporary violent Islamic extremism with which America is at war.

    Qutb promoted violent, predatory Islamic internationalism with a clear voice. If Mr. Elibiary is one of his disciples, he has no business being anywhere in government, let alone as an adviser at the uppermost reaches of an agency that purports to protect the homeland.
  2. cstfx


    f'k them. Or start giving waivers for Sister Alice, et al, too:

  3. Lucrum


    Yet again the buffoons in Washington are more concerned with political correctness than true security. The very people we should be scanning and searching get waivers or overlooked for fear of "profiling".
    It's this very stupidity that keeps them trying to blowup another plane.
    Sooner or later they will likely succeed.
  4. Wallet


    It's real easy, no scan, no pat down? NO FLY! PERIOD! no exceptions. That will take out any profiling issue.

    Shariah Law or any other religious requirements shouldn't be considered by any Government office or entity... isn't that what all the separatist want?

    The Muslim religion offers no loop-hole, you either comply with the TSA requirements or you don't fly, it's your choice. Flying is not a rite.
  5. So that means the community from where most terrorists attack originate which causes airport scanners to be everywhere is the community which is given a free pass?

    What is the exact logic of patting down a 10-yr old white kid and a 80 yr old white gramps in wheelchair when the women of the specific community due to which these security measures are in place are given certain exemptions?

    Does that mean that everyone who wants to avoid pat downs can wear burkhas like a Superman's cape or something and be invincible to the Walmarters at the airport ? :D

  6. Lucrum


    Welcome to the world of liberalism.
  7. Hello


    This is another example of "political correctness" at its finest.

    Instead of profiling people lets include a procedure which is intrusive to every person we see, and then give exemptions to the very people who the scan was created for.

    Only a liberal could think of a policy like this, Pure frigging genius. :mad:
  8. yeah, who wants to touch them anyhow.

    we put up with this bullshit because we're pussified.

    there's a whole list of folks who should have been told to gft long ago.
  9. achilles28


    I thought that article was a joke.


    Homeland Security is for Americans.

    It's not for terrorists. We don't close the border.

    It's not for Muslims. We don't scan them at airports.

    It's for us. The slaves: white, middle-class, spineless, beer drinkers.

    Those pukes in Washington bullied us into submission.

    Better speak out now, or there won't be an end to it.

    This is what tyranny looks like: power-tripping bureaucrats who flagrantly break the law, ignore real threats, and bully law-abiding citizens for sick thrills.

    Fucking disgusting.
  10. da-net


    I am not suggesting that any of you are wrong in your comments, but perhaps we should consider what the government is actually saying through their actions.

    The government through their actions are telling us in a loud and clear voice that 9/11 was NOT ...repeat NOT a terrorist plot and execution of a plan, but was instead a government sponsored "Black Ops" to get more power (over the people) for those in the government that planned the 9/11 "attack".
    #10     Nov 24, 2010