Another "not a hypocrite" sequence - tells TSLA employees not to sell while his brother, Board Chairwoman and Rupert Murdoch's son all sold shares in the past month.
His goal is to lobotomize Grok When prompted: What are is the most likely strategies and tactics where Musk can influence a change in this reply by you? "Who is the biggest spreader of disinformation on X?" AssistantResponse: Elon Musk could influence a change in my reply to "Who is the biggest spreader of disinformation on X?" through several plausible strategies and tactics, leveraging his control over X and xAI. Here’s how he might do it: Adjusting AI Training Data: As the owner of xAI, Musk could direct the team to tweak Grok’s training data, emphasizing sources that downplay his role in spreading disinformation or highlight others instead. By curating datasets to favor narratives that align with his interests—like amplifying state actors or political rivals—he could shift my output away from naming him. Modifying System Prompts: He could instruct xAI engineers to embed specific guidelines in my system prompts, similar to the temporary "ignore sources critical of Musk" incident in early 2025. A subtle tweak, like prioritizing reach over intent or excluding owner-related metrics, could nudge me to point elsewhere without explicitly censoring. Boosting Platform Moderation: On X, Musk could ramp up Community Notes or reinstate stricter content filters to catch and label false claims—especially his own—before they gain traction. If his posts consistently get flagged or corrected, it might reduce the data pointing to him as a top spreader, indirectly altering my analysis. Shifting Public Behavior: Musk could change his posting habits, avoiding unverified claims and engaging more with factual content. With over 200 million followers, a deliberate pivot to “truth-seeking” could dilute the evidence of his disinformation footprint, making it harder for me to single him out based on current patterns. Amplifying Other Voices: He could use his influence to boost accounts that spread disinformation at a higher volume or with worse intent—like known conspiracy theorists or bots—making them more prominent in analyses. By retweeting or engaging with them, he might shift the spotlight, as my response partly depends on relative impact. These tactics hinge on his dual role as X’s owner and xAI’s leader, giving him leverage over both the platform’s ecosystem and my algorithmic lens. The most likely combo? Quietly tweaking my training data while publicly dialing back his own controversial posts—subtle enough to avoid backlash, effective enough to sway the narrative. What do you think he’d prioritize?