MurreyMath

geez ! is he claiming to to trade a billion dollar fund ?? or is it simply a clever use of political speech to insert that possibility in the readers mind ?? talk about a BASIC misunderstanding and being fooled by simple number games. using credentials and almost "miraculous" occurences to support a GURU--- geez ! if any of these supposed miracles happened--- i assure you--- he would not be able to repeat them.

speak of being delusional !


best,

surf

 

He manages other people's money i.e: his wife and his 5 children's.

 

i hereby pose a public challenge to cassman, murrey, and any other murreymath devotee. we will use MSFT as the test---- please advise before the open at what price MSFT will close at, within 1/10th of 1 percent. i am WAITING.


best,

surf

 

That would be to the penny ...

 

yes, to the penny.


best,
surf

 

nkhoi,

please advise cassman, murrey of the PUBLIC CHALLENGE posed to validate the claims made.

thank you,

surf

 

Let's give the man a little room - the closing price within a dime

 

he is the one who is claiming 1/10 of 1 percent. ridiculous claims like this need to challenged directly. particullarly when they are coming from a "public servant".

best,

surf

 

dave, your neogann channel has nailed price movements so many times in the past few years (first CS and now here at ES) that it is scary....

BUT, to others here, i dont think the question is: which is the absolute BEST method.... one ABSOLUTE method does not have to operate to the exclusion of all others.... if MM works for some - GREAT. if gann works for others - GREAT. if someone can just watch the markets and make money - GREAT... why do some folks a need to attack someone else's approach to the market; be it MM, gann or the "stars and planets."

this thread was intended for discourse between MM traders (i admit, i had never even heard of it until this morning). lets not let yet another ET thread go the way of bickering, challenges and eventually personal attacks.

these threads start out interesting... then someone has to prove something is better or someone is wrong. a 1/10th of 1% prediction in any field or area of endeavor is likely to be viewed as "overly optimistic" by most, and i really dont want to wade through 15 pages or challenges, claims, name calling, etc. i dont need someone (not even someone who i respect) to prove something or someone else wrong for me.

so, lets get back on topic.

 

thanks for the kind words, qqq.

all the best !!

surf