Indeed.Polls told you Trump would get the most votes in the republican primary and that Hillary would get more votes than Trump.When the polls show Trump has lost around 10 points in support since last year its good to listen.A guy who only won by 80,000 votes cant afford to lose 10 points of support especially when Democrats will be energized as they have shown in state wide races in Virginia and Alabama.
Yeh, there is a lot of recycling of broken thinking going on. I heard this segment on tv about how Hillary is gearing with the dnc to go out and "help out" on the trail for the midterms. They acknowledge that she has problems "but lots of people still like her" blah, blah, blah. What could go wrong there? We can recall that both in 2008 and 2012 their plan was that in the end Hillary had a "secret campaign weapon" to rely on. ie. Bubba, the greatest campaigner and vote getter on earth. And then in both campaigns - they ended out praying to god that he would just shut up and stay home. The goal became to keep him off the trail. Remember in 2008, they sent Bubba, the first black president, to south Carolina to campaign to get the black vote and then he dissed Jesse Jackson there and barely got out alive. heh. Recyled, old broken thinking. The dem party is stuck on stupid, so send Hillary out. hmmm. They don't know what to do with trump. Half of them want to impeach him tomorrow but schumer and Pelosi desperately try to tone that down because- to your point- the impeachment of trump could morph into a big MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, DRAIN THE SWAMP movement 2.0 that would backfire on them. Confused bunch, they is.
Probably would need to be someone like Mark Cuban who may be more likeable than Tim Kaine/Pocahontas.
Did the FBI Conspire to Stop Trump? Patrick Buchanan December 26, 2017 The original question the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign was to answer was a simple one: Did he do it? Did Trump, or officials with his knowledge, collude with Vladimir Putin's Russia to hack the emails of John Podesta and the DNC, and leak the contents to damage Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump? A year and a half into the investigation, and, still, no "collusion" has been found. Yet the investigation goes on, at the demand of the never-Trump media and Beltway establishment. Hence, and understandably, suspicions have arisen. Are the investigators after the truth, or are they after Trump? Set aside the Trump-Putin conspiracy theory momentarily, and consider a rival explanation for what is going down here: That, from the outset, Director James Comey and an FBI camarilla were determined to stop Trump and elect Hillary Clinton. Having failed, they conspired to break Trump's presidency, overturn his mandate and bring him down. Essential to any such project was first to block any indictment of Hillary for transmitting national security secrets over her private email server. That first objective was achieved 18 months ago. On July 5, 2016, Comey stepped before a stunned press corps to declare that, given the evidence gathered by the FBI, "no reasonable prosecutor" would indict Clinton. Therefore, that was the course he, Comey, was recommending. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, compromised by her infamous 35-minute tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton -- to discuss golf and grandkids -- seconded Comey's decision. And so Hillary walked. Why is this suspicious? First, whether or not to indict was a decision that belonged to the Department of Justice, not Jim Comey or the FBI. His preemption of Justice Department authority was astonishing. Second, while Comey said in his statement that Hillary had been "extremely careless" with security secrets, in his first draft, Clinton was declared guilty of "gross negligence" -- the precise language in the statute to justify indictment. Who talked Comey into softening the language to look less than criminal? One man was FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife, Jill, a Virginia state senate candidate, received a munificent PAC contribution of $474,000 from Clinton family friend and big bundler Terry McAuliffe. Also urging Comey to soften the fatal phrase "gross negligence" was key FBI agent Peter Strzok. In text messages to his FBI lover Lisa Page, Strzok repeatedly vented his detestation of the "idiot" Trump. After one meeting with "Andy" (McCabe), Strzok told Page an "insurance policy" was needed to keep Trump out of the White House. Also, it appears Comey began drafting his exoneration statement of Hillary before the FBI had even interviewed her. And when the FBI did, Hillary was permitted to have her lawyers present. One need not be a conspiracy nut to conclude the fix was in, and a pass for Hillary wired from the get-go. Comey, McCabe, Strzok were not going to recommend an indictment that would blow Hillary out of the water and let the Trump Tower crowd waltz into the White House. Yet, if Special Counsel Robert Mueller cannot find any Trump collusion with the Kremlin to tilt the outcome of the 2016 election, his investigators might have another look at the Clinton campaign. For there a Russian connection has been established. Kremlin agents fabricated, faked, forged, or found the dirt on Trump that was passed to ex-British MI6 spy Christopher Steele, and wound up in his "dirty dossier" that was distributed to the mainstream media and the FBI to torpedo Trump. And who hired Steele to tie Trump to Russia? Fusion GPS, the oppo research outfit into which the DNC and Clinton campaign pumped millions through law firm Perkins Coie. Let's review the bidding. The "dirty dossier," a mixture of fabrications, falsehoods and half-truths, created to destroy Trump and make Hillary president, was the product of a British spy's collusion with Kremlin agents. In Dec. 26's Washington Times, Rowan Scarborough writes that the FBI relied on this Kremlin-Steele dossier of allegations and lies to base their decision "to open a counterintelligence investigation (of Trump)." And press reports "cite the document's disinformation in requests for court-approved wiretaps." If this is true, a critical questions arises: Has the Mueller probe been so contaminated by anti-Trump bias and reliance on Kremlin fabrications that any indictment it brings will be suspect in the eyes of the American people? Director Comey has been fired. FBI No. 2 McCabe is now being retired under a cloud. Mueller's top FBI investigator, Peter Strzok, and lover Lisa, have been discharged. And Mueller is left to rely upon a passel of prosecutors whose common denominator appears to be that they loathe Trump and made contributions to Hillary. Attorney General Bobby Kennedy had his "Get Hoffa Squad" to take down Teamsters boss Jimmy Hoffa. J. Edgar Hoover had his vendetta against Dr. Martin Luther King. Is history repeating itself -- with the designated target of an elite FBI cabal being the President of the United States? https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/12/26/did_the_fbi_conspire_to_stop_trump_135857.html
It's Buchanan, post it in the jokes section for more responses When you're losing the game, you work the refs.
‘Intransigence’: Nunes Blasts Justice Department For Hiding Dossier Records “At this point it seems the DOJ and FBI need to be investigating themselves,” Nunes wrote Thursday in a bluntly worded letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein." http://googleweblight.com/?lite_url...529590&sig=AOyes_RsQpMFIvPm-aClxwkZ1HdhLk-qBg
Nunes is in a big dump. NEW: Devin Nunes' Campaign Donor Was Original Funder Of Trump-Russia Dossier Republican Congressman Devin Nunes received a $5,400 contribution to his campaign committee from the owner of the Washington Free Beacon, the original funder of the Trump-Russia Dossier. The contribution was made on April 7th, 2015. It was reported in the NY Times in late October that Paul Singer’s conservative website originally funded the research for what became known as the Dossier: www.nytimes.com/... Here is a link to the original record of the contribution with an image of it below: docquery.fec.gov/...
False. gps fusion did not begin working with the russian intel people until the democrats began funding gps fusion. So the washington freebeacon did not fund the russian dossier, they only funded oppos research on trump. This is old news. I'm surprised it's still being brought up. I give this one at least 4 pinocchios.