That's just it, while you might see Trump as a bully, many of us see your combined efforts and tactics as a bigger, more unfair bully, currently personified by malicious Mooooler and his malicious prosecution, who is getting revenge for himself (who was turned down FBI Director position), for Rosenstein (who felt slighted in being used to fire Comey), and every other hater in the media, who combine to create one giant bully. Nobody likes bullies, and at some point it's not about the underdog Trump (who is being bullied), but the people he represents, bullied by a vocal minority. The vocal minority should pay for this prosecution in the interest of transparency.
Another irony is seeing leftist and media tantrums about human rights and how evil NK is after their shameless fawning during the Olympics, now that it looks like Trump -- and not Obama -- might accomplish what Bill Clinton, G.W. Bush and Obama could not.
Discovery is usually appropriate but not always. The government often hides identities when they have an ongoing investigation or to protect informants, etc.
If they think they need to redact, then redact during discovery, allowing time for the other party to motion for a lifting of the redaction.
Ok.. Trump being bullied. Karma is a bitch. (Dharma really). And it is not bullying, he is the one going on about collusion and pardoning himself like a wild man. The investigation has not put a finger on his collar.
If you were to go back to where you came from, where would that be? Panama? Brittain? Canada? How are these places better than (supreme over) Russia?
Says the paper trading blowhard from Colombia who changed where he's from after I called him out. Why haven't you registered? Foreign trolls like you have no business trying to influence our politics with elections coming up in November. See above.
Discovery is appropriate if the defense team so decides. The judge cannot stop discovery as a defendant has a right to defend themselves. The judge can rule against elements of it if the government makes a successful argument, but the judge can also dismiss a case if the governments need to suppress it deprives the defendant of the right to cross examine a crucial witness or access to exculpatory evidence. Defense lawyers know this and try to push the discovery into areas where the government does not want to go. So it is up to the judge to decide whether a piece of evidence it relevant, crucial to a defendants defense and if it is then that's the government's problem. They need to decide whether exposing that is worth getting a conviction.