Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Tony Stark, Jul 20, 2017.

  1. fhl

    fhl

    [​IMG]
     
    #41     Jul 20, 2017
  2. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    I thought it had been a year of nothingburger... now they're thorough?
     
    #42     Jul 20, 2017
  3. Hilary must be laughing her ass off. There was supposed to be a special investigation on her multiple fraudulent affairs . . . .


    instead.
     
    #43     Jul 20, 2017
    Tony Stark likes this.
  4. Not sure what point you are making.

    But Stark was giving kudos to meueller by saying that he did an 'amazing job" by going right after the Deutch Bank records. My point was - yes- amazing how diligent investigators have become about chasing down all things trump. But the investigation of Hillary was a complete clown show where Loretta and Comey used all their powers to make sure that they just went through the motions but never actually looked at what a real investigation would have looked at.
    In fact Loretta made sure that it was not even referred to as an investigation.

    How would the dems like it if Muellers wife was running for congress and the RNC suddenly decided to contribute 750K to his wifes campaign right in the middle of the investigation.
    Maybe the dems here could tell me how that would work for ya.

    -TFT
     
    #44     Jul 20, 2017
  5. jem

    jem

    protecting liberty is about the protecting the freedoms of all the people its not about protecting the rights of criminals.

    your realize in the 70s liberals supported constitutional rights and freedom from govt searches as seizures.

    when a conservative person has to explain the importance of 4th amendment rights to a paid democrat... we are in trouble. democrats are no longer liberals.

    Do you even learn about privacy rights and miranda rights and how liberals fought so hard for them?

    Now we have the left cheerleading the destruction of freedom.
    I fear for the rights of the next generation or 2.

     
    #45     Jul 20, 2017
  6. jem

    jem

    So let me explain this to you.
    The govt and cops have the ability to set anyone up at will.
    Crooked cops and govt could then blackmail the shit out of you and control everyone the way the SS and facist and socialist police states have done and still do today.

    The 4th amendment protects us from that.

    If the govt had no right to search your stuff in the first place...
    They can' t set you up... even if a crooked cop has it in for you.

    So our constitution is not set up to protect criminals... is set up to protect the people from criminals in the govt.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2017
    #46     Jul 20, 2017
  7. Tom B

    Tom B

    Plus, Mueller is demonstrating that he has questionable integrity. Why are there so many leaks about the investigation?
     
    #47     Jul 20, 2017
    Optionpro007 likes this.


  8. Leaks are what Comey likes and wants. And Comey's wishes are Mueller's commands. The whole investigation is a Comey/Mueller tag team operation. Mueller's see his primary mission being to even the score for Comey who suffered at the hands of Trump- when in fact his own crooked incompetency torpedoed him even with democrats. Just ask Killary.

    -TFT
     
    #48     Jul 20, 2017
  9. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Why does government need ACTUAL data to set you up, they can easily create fictitious transactions and records to incriminate you - they don't need to search anything.

    Your arguments are dumb and ridiculous.
     
    #49     Jul 20, 2017
    Tony Stark likes this.
  10. jem

    jem

    you don't deserve the freedom you were given.

    go talk to a cop or a retired one and ask him if a dirty cop in the narcotics division wanted to set you up... how long would it take for them to guarantee you a 7 to 10 year sentence minimum even though you have no record.

    The answer is a matter of hours or less.

    that is the point of why are you to be free from searches and seizures.

    in the colonies the king could use a writ to search people homes at any time. Our founding fathers made sure that could no happen.

    you would give back to the govt?


    Your arguments are dumb and ridiculous.[/QUOTE]


     
    #50     Jul 20, 2017