Mueller admits: Can’t Indict a Sitting President

Discussion in 'Politics' started by bone, May 16, 2018.

  1. bone

    bone

    1. the methodologies employed to develop those suspicions could very well be illegal, and 2. The Clinton campaign purchased oppo research developed by foreign actors using foreign sources
     
    #41     May 17, 2018
  2. Note the crabwalk over to Clinton as Mueller starts to go flaccid.

    Yeh sure, okay, I will bite. Everyone in the State Department is authorized to run their own server in their basement with no security protections and beyond the reach and knowledge of the department and when the state department requests copies because they dont have backup they are free to delete whatever they want and then bleachbit it.

    Yup. I am pretty sure that is covered in the Departmental policies.
     
    #42     May 17, 2018
    Poindexter, Optionpro007 and bone like this.
  3. bone

    bone

    Sanguine, methodical, well argued. Fairly unemotional for you. :thumbsup:
     
    #43     May 17, 2018
  4. Heh, the witch-hunters are getting a sniff of defeat and trying to go high minded about what this investigation is all about.

    Let me give you a clue. Yes, the investigation is supposed to be a counter-intelligence investigation and not a criminal investigaton just nail Trump. But dont kid yourself. The roots of this investigation go back to all that dossier stuff, fbi misconduct and collusion, etc that all were intended to bring down a president who committed the crime of having been lawfully elected without the Swamp's approval.
     
    #44     May 17, 2018
  5. bone

    bone

    Speaking of collusion, I like how how the DNC is suing the Trump campaign for collusion. Oh was Wikileaks ever a fountain of stank on the DNC. The DNC was one giant collusion factory - just ask Bernie supporters.
     
    #45     May 17, 2018
  6. UsualName

    UsualName

    I don’t think so for number one and number two isn’t a crime.
     
    #46     May 17, 2018
  7. UsualName

    UsualName

    I don’t think so anymore but, yes, there was a precedent of Secretaries of State using private email and it was not forbidden.

    And, under the law all officials are allowed to review all emails and remove all personal emails from the public record.
     
    #47     May 17, 2018
  8. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    Actually thats a fact trump jr admitted it
     
    #48     May 17, 2018
  9. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    Sure 3000 + lies Donald
     
    #49     May 17, 2018
  10. UsualName

    UsualName

    Well the DOJ has other investigations goin on but Mueller’s is specific to the Trump campaign and Russia. You’re just in a tizzy because you’re afraid of the extent and impact of Russian interference that may be uncovered, and how it may have actually have helped Trump win.
     
    #50     May 17, 2018