‘Americans Will Believe All of It’ Russian TV Hosts Mock US For Believing Putin’s ‘Trolling’ Endorsement of Kamala Harris https://www.mediaite.com/tv/america...putins-trolling-endorsement-of-kamala-harris/
It's already known that the organizations listed above are foreign sponsored and paying pundits for their opinion. There's no way to tell their intentions toward the U.S. nor how much (or little) influence they have. We only know they're looking out for themselves. Therefore, these answers are inconsistent with the facts. IOW... if we can't allow RT to exist then we should also go after Imevisión. In order to help draw the contest to a close, the judges suggest I rephrase the question: Why is Garland and the DOJ going after a seemingly random state sponsored media organization instead of lounging on teh beach like supreme leader Biden?
The judges caution that your disqualification for nitpicking is currently under review. In addition, those organizations have taken donations from many unknown actors.
They prey on people who struggle with weighting things. Anything that seems like anything else is pretty much the same and the mark is incapacitated. Russia propoganda 101. But what about. You're no better than meeeeeee....! I do my own research. Don't judge the source, discuss the topic! bla bla.
you made the list to characterize that foreign influence is rampant. Disputing that list is not nitpicking, it’s attacking your core argument
Don't hate the player, hate the game. The judges note that the audience is starting to sound like a spoiled child.