Ms. Obama woo's the audience

We all know where this is going. The "straight down the middle" MSM can't help but gush all over itself. I fully expect by the time President Obama is finished giving his speech we will see human sacrifices in his honor.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/...itics-lights-twitter-141131431--election.html

 

Awww, now come on Cap'n. You know Michelle hit it out the park, especially when compared to Ann. Was that even close?

 

I wonder if that guy, what's his name? Is going to piss down his own leg again.

 

Dick Morris saw it a different way.

Michelle Obama did a great job of selling her own candidacy for First Lady, but she was less successful in pushing her husband’s candidacy. Unfortunately for her, there is no separate election for First Lady. You’re part of a ticket.

Her comments about her own story and her own values were moving. She clearly articulated her own values and convincingly rehabilitated her image from the days when she said she was never proud of America. She mobilized the crowd and turned them on. She really galvanized the crowd with her energy. But does she have a relevance to the election? Does she produce votes for Barack? I doubt it.

 

There you go again. ~ Ronald Reagan to Jimmy Carter

 

I'm with Charles Krauthammer. The speech was "brilliantly delivered". Whether one agrees with the substance of it is another story.

 

And that is fair enuf. But the DNC is building the motif of the common man versus the man who can borrow money "from your parents".

BTW. If that Castro has no skeletons, we will see him again.

 

Me-Chelle says "I" or "Me" 83 times in speech.

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/09/05/michelle-83-times/

 

If someone is giving a testimony, then "I" would be an effective use of speech.

Now, why did Christie wait till the end of his speech to even mention the RNC nominee?

 

This thread isn't about anything Christie did. It's about Me-Chelle.