If it was so much bullshit, you'd be easily and quickly able to dismantle their arguments. But you can't, so you resort to character defamation. Your M. O.
https://journals.lww.com/americanth...in_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
LOL -- go read what the CDC has to say. Or trying reading the dozens of studies showing absolutely no benefit whatsoever in using Ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.
LOL - all of your information is old. I like to see the scientific standard or the part of the scientific method that states if there are articles published that state there is not enough data to come to a conclusion that when a peer-reviewed study is published in a respectable journal that has enough data that the peer-reviewed study shall be dismissed because of the old articles.