Moving Forward: Your Opinion of ET

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by Baron, Aug 21, 2013.

How Should ET Move Foward from here?

  1. ET needs to implement lots of new features, like Facebook, LinkedIn and other social sites.

    10 vote(s)
    7.9%
  2. ET should incrementally add new features based solely on user feedback.

    48 vote(s)
    37.8%
  3. ET should get rid of features like Books/Brokers/Software Ratings and stick to forums only.

    11 vote(s)
    8.7%
  4. ET has been great for the last 15 years just like it is and should be left alone.

    58 vote(s)
    45.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zdreg

    zdreg

    I had my differences with him over his hero worshiping trait
    i.e. timothy sykes, neiderhoffer. but this much can be said for him what he has forgotten about markets you still have to learn.

    your remark leaves no doubt as to your character
     
    #591     Sep 4, 2013
  2. I think Surf himself would disagree with that statement.

    atticus
     
    #592     Sep 4, 2013
  3. After getting him banned, you presume to speak <i>pro fluctus ascensorem</i>?
     
    #593     Sep 4, 2013
  4. It's easy to speak for a simpleton. Now how did I get him banned? I must have powerful friends. He pissed off the entire site, save for you, honey. I give credit where credit is due; even I have not succeeded in alienating tens of thousands of ETers.

    I realize that you're pot-committed with the new baby and that you have to back him up, but wtf were you thinking?
     
    #594     Sep 4, 2013
  5. even if drownpruf was new here..how could you say surf "knows more about markets?"

    to him. wild ASSumptions.

    you disappoint me.

    additionally surf always ignored rational points only to use a few often repeated key retorts. as a guy who claimed to be in the know; he behaved like a kid in the basement.

    with that said i would not mind him back if he promised to act more like a trader and not so much an instigator. a bonus would be if he actually did the trades he calls out.
     
    #595     Sep 4, 2013
  6. This is what led to his banning IMO. He would make statements, ignore rational points, and would continue to argue. It wasn't his disagreeing that was the problem, it's the WAY in which he did. And when he admitted the Surf persona was just here to create "reactions", I believe he sealed his own fate.


     
    #596     Sep 4, 2013
  7. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    smurf got himself banned - again. Just like he got himself banned all those previous times he's been banned.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






    Anyone already suggested rendering the ignore feature inoperative in (and only in) the P&R forum?


    My inspiration for the idea:

    "Not for the faint of heart. If you are easily offended, stay away from this forum!"
     
    #597     Sep 4, 2013
  8. He knows next to nothing about the markets...Seriously, the guy proved it time after time for more than a decade.

    (How much did he promise to deposit in your paypal account?)
     
    #598     Sep 4, 2013
  9. zdreg

    zdreg

    "]even if drownpruf was new here..how could you say surf "knows more about markets?"

    to him. wild ASSumptions."

    i did a sampling of his 83 posts.
     
    #599     Sep 4, 2013
  10. Dumbass.

    He signed one of his last posts as "Atticus".

    Now go back, do a little research and get back to us.
     
    #600     Sep 4, 2013
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.