With this bizarre conclusion by my evil twin doppelgänger--- I will follow my own advices placing the surfer obsessed alias on ignore for awhile. See ya! surf
That's a lie, Sheda. I haven't posted under an alias for many years and even then I was being paid serious money to drive eyeballs to another site. Show some integrity man.
Ah, you got me. I set the account up in 2006, knowing that I'd need a spare alias in 2013... You really are too stupid for words.
Yea, you made your living trolling a site trying to redirect traffic while every one else was busy trading, real integrity, and of course people respond with information about them selves as follows You must have been HOUNDED so hard about your goodboy name in school it split you into 4 or something haha. I have known schizophrenics who have no handle on reality yet have more handle on the truth than you.
The fact that you did that, shows what kind of integrity you have. Sorry Dave, but everything I've seen here reads as 'Professional Scumbag' on my scummy-o-meter. I reckon you'd sell your granny down the river, if you had the chance.
The point I was trying to make but apparently this was so confusing for Surf he had to put me on ignore.
Baron: another idea is to allow members to vote on the posters value to the conversation and then post the average of all of their votes below the screen name. You could have catagories such as: Master Mentor Valuable Contributor Motivated Learner Beginner Frequent but Low Value Forum Pest --- Toxic Today, all you see next to a screen name is the total number of posts which is a very poor indicator of quality, experience, or merit. This would be easy to implement. It would also motivate some posters to avoid trash-talk a little. You could also allow reader to filter out all "Frequent but Low Value" posts and replies. At the bottom of each message today you could have, "Edit---- Quote--- Vote" That is 3 good ideas Baron --- do I get a free month on ET in exchange?
I have serious doubts that you've ever seen serious money. I also doubt you've ever been paid a cent for any of these "articles".