I don't think so , my is bigger , what is total return? My is 1100% at the moment and was probably as high as 1300 % at the top
I have the best numbers ever seen at C2; return / DD. Apparently you need help with arithmetic. My peak PNL was 1,333% and 1,244% when system was closed. At under 23% drawdown, not your absurd -77%. It's comical that your DD is the inverse of mine. Not good for you. I returned over 55x draw-down. One sub turned 300K into over a mil in the first year. I know bc he was a client.
My peak is 1270% not far off from yours, drawdown was around 20% as well,77 happened in the last year when I hiked up my trading size 5 times in order to double and triple quickly , I had nothing to lose because there were no subs, so I think we are on the same level
2012-2013 I don't remember exactly, but it's not important , ppl wised up after 98 crush,before 98 was golden years to make money from subscription , and then it went down to almost nothing
Dude, you're insane. Near the same level? 20%? You lost 60% in one month this year. I exceeded your notional at less than half of your draw-down. Which would you rather have invested in? His: Or mine:
Keep in mind that there is no bear market in Forex. Never. The whole problem has to do with your drawdown and maximum drawdown. Make 2% a month on average with 20% max drawdown (or less) in 5 years and you will get hundreds of subscribers. But generate a 70% max drawdown (like in your case) and you are history, even if you manage to return 10,000,000% in 5 years. Now all that your subscribers (and potential customers) see is that huge huge drawdown and nothing else matters to them. People do NOT like to lose 30, 40, 50 or 70% of their money, period. See, the secret of making it on Collective2 is to keep the max drawdown under 20% or less. When traders start to see drawdowns that exceed 35% they jump ship and unsubscribe quickly (now conviced you are just another amateur), regardless of your performance.