Like I said before "the heck with the debate, help me figure out how to traverse the supermarket parking lot". I watched at WalMart as blacks came out the doors, setting off the alarms because they were stealing stuff, they would laugh and hurry up to their car, nobody was going to stop them, there could be a riot or a lawsuit... I guess they watch them with cameras and if it's low dollar enough they let them go... I was in a store owned by orientals yesterday, couple of bad mouthing black kids came in and were walking around, the girl watching all the cameras got very nervous and never stopped watching them.... before that she hardly was paying attention to the cameras... I heard once long ago that the Klan was started up because of all the black criminals running around when Lincoln freed them, there are areas that are run by the Klan even in this day and age, that might be a good place to temporarily relocate to if things get really messed up.... Our area got rid of the section 8 housing subsidy a few years ago, all the blacks moved out, now, with the real estate owners in some trouble, they had it brough back, immediately we had blacks and several armed robberies, a murder or two, etc... it just went from really peaceful and quiet to really shitty overnight.... I'm watching this banking meltdown, if things get bad to where there isn't ghetto food money it could get really interesting... all this government action to "help" blacks was never about helping them, it was about making them into a weapon against the prosperous Jews and Protestants, same as most all that happens all over the world actually...
That's all very well, but how on earth can you possibly expect change unless the truth about Africans is accepted? The truth that deliquency, illegitimacy and delapidation follow wherever in the world large numbers of Africans congregate. Now, that's harsh, and it'll be necessary to soften the message somewhat, but ultimately, that's what needs to be understood. Otherwise... nothing will change. South Africa, Brazil, that's what you can expect to become of America. Reality is precisely that stark. Crime follows blacks as surely as night follows day. The real estate/construction industry is in cahoots with the bleeding hearts when it comes to section 8, you can be quite sure of that. Peaceful, low or non-black neighborhoods are built up, liberal do-gooders want blacks to be able to take advantage and acculturate themselves in civilized society, so you get the section 8s coming. Crime and general mayhem quickly follow and the locals are once again forced to flee... to the shiny new estates the construction companies have erected and the real estate agents are eager to sell them. The same pattern holds with the spics. It's just not as quite as bad and it takes a higher level of saturation for things to degrade. Whereas it might only take 10-20% black for things to begin falling apart, it might require something like 30-50% spics; although spics vary greatly, so it depends on which spics you're talking about. Those Salvadoran "Mara Salvatruchas" and those latino gangs that have tattoos all over their faces, good God, that's pure human scum of which nothing decent can be salvaged; I'd fucking mow them all down, just give me the green light. It'll reach that point eventually. There's just no longer any basis for believing anything might actually improve. No basis whatsoever. Your country's going broke fighting the world in order to make it safe for Israel -- a country of absolutely no value to Americans whatsoever -- all the while hordes of 3rd worlders who not only have inordinate difficulties in mastering your language, they state upfront that they ought not to have to learn it, and that, instead, you ought to learn theirs, keep invading unimpeded, and on arrival set about taking generous helpings of your welfare to breed almost as indiscriminately as the lowest ghetto nigger, and thus perpetuate their poverty, deliquency and general incivility just as effectively.
I arrived in America full of goodwill and positive feelings towards blacks. Only a week later I was avoiding them as habitually as the most seasoned klansman. ----------------------------- I've heard the same comments from others. Another interesting point brought up, when white people say "I've learned to become racist from black people". Tough nut to crack, common misconception that white people create racism against blacks, far worse when black people create racism in white people from their own actions.
Spect8or, you seem to deteriorate a bit more every year. Tell me now; <b>Over the course of the 20th century, which race mistreated their fellow man worse than the whites did?</b> Can you name one single race responsible for committing more 20th century murders than the 'civilized' white people? How about theft of property and other human rights abuses in the 20th century: Which race was a greater offender than the whites? I'd really like to know! When considering more than just the momentarily brief flash of time that is our past few decades, to accuse non-white races of relative barbarism is just completely laughable.
I am a WASP, with roots in the British Isles. Do you get ANYTHING right? You seem less reliable than a stopped clock. You say that crime follows blacks, and then you say that you would like to "mow down" another human being. Clearly an inconsistency, but, as we all know, you are too dumb to figure that out. If you cannot define race, then how can you use terms such as "race denier"? I could go on, but you are not worth a minute more of my time. Goodbye, troll.
The most detestable human beings in the twentieth century were indeed those of European descent: Hitler et al, Stalin, Milosevic, spect8tor.
Devry? LOL. Did you graduate from high school? Good luck with that GED thing. There is no "z" in enterprise.
I said you use the language of a hysterical kike. If you're not one, very well. My arguments hardly rest on you being jewish. I just know that through experience the most vehement race deniers tend to be jews. You deny that anything meaningful can be stated about race sans a strict, completely unambiguous definition. I contend that it can. I contend that this is precisely what biologists do when they make meaningful statements -- including the formulation of testabel hypotheses -- about genus, species, family and the various other biological classifications. Again, absolutely no one who is anyone who debates the validity of heredity explanations for human socio-economic outcomes resorts to obfuscation about broad human racial classifications. James Flynn, discoverer of the much touted "Flynn Effect" (and commie sympathiser, a claim which I can substantiate) accepts completely the validity of speaking about "blacks" and "whites," even though those concepts unquestionably blur at the margins.
Do you believe that there is a "black race" and a "white (Caucasian) race"? One can believe that there are Caucasians without accepting that there is a Caucasian race.
Actually, it's more the case that I uncover more about reality every year. I'm not enthused about any of it, mind you, but reality can only be ignored at our peril. What has this to do with anything? I mean, really, I want to know, Rearden. You've bypassed every single substantive point I have raised -- and there have been many -- and zeroed in on what, I presume, most riles you: the threat that whites may think of themselves as a people with a real history and legitimate interests -- the way Jews, blacks, Chinese, Mexicans etc do. Isn't this what it comes down to, that you'd rather have them eternally penitent than acting in their own interests? It's not a question of whether it's laughable, it's a question of whether it's provable or substantiated. Why don't you give that a whirl?