Let's clarify this: It was at a newly built shopping center in a relatively prosperous, growing south suburb. By no means was it a "ghetto." This robbery doesn't add up . . . who the hell robs a Lane Bryant, early in the morning? They can't have much more than $200 cash at that point. There's more to this story, and in the context of this thread, it could be a really interesting discussion, once the details come out.
I don't care what caused it, at all. I need to know how to negotiate the parking lot when I'm shopping. I don't have a permit to carry, any suggestions? I do some martial arts and have pepper spray on the key chain already... dang, if your first move is a disabling one, breaking every bone in their body should be easy... I sort of hope one of these gang banger assholes comes after me without a backup plan, they are used to whiteys not being armed.. I had a friend that killed two of them when they tried to carjack him, he ran one over and pushed the other one off the truck at high speed, he never even had to answer a single question to the LAPD..... Something to remember in case of riots is you can kill at will... During those LA riots I was gassing up and some Mexicans drove into the parking lot, one got out and broke some glass, he was about 5' tall, I could have killed him with a round kick up under his head but I didn't know about the kill-at-will thingy, I think people should be informed of that.... I still have dreams at night of rubbing his face in that glass, I really, really hate rude bastards... If the economy goes as far south as the banking crisis seems to indicate it could, blacks that are currently beggars/welfare drainers will have even less coming in, they could indeed become the number one enemy of whiteys in the USA, similar to South Africa currently... except that their numbers are smaller in the USA, still in the areas around the ghetto monsters it could get particularly ugly... hee hee, I can't see blacks swarming into Mexican neighborhoods and getting away with much, Mexicans are way more anarchistic than whiteys, no, whiteys will be the main target for gangsta's, after their grandmother of course...
I don't think our respected fellow ET member spect8or is the type of person who spends time worrying about the scientific basis for his beliefs. He's apparently unaware of the fact that the work done to sequence the human genome revealed that a black man and a white man can easily be more related, 'racially' speaking, than two black men or two apparently Asian men. In fact skin color is a pretty bad phylogenic predictor. But of course when you admire the Nazis and your first response to those who disagree with you is 'Fucking Filthy Jew', we don't expect these things to matter much. spect8or, I'm surprised you spend any time here at all. There are so many other sites where you will find like minded people. Are you here to tip a few fence sitters over to the dark side? : )
Is it mere randomness that Black's dominate every speed position (defense/WR/RB) in the NFL? Do we believe Blacks are intrinsically faster or do we instead think Randy Moss was running sprints and training as a three year old? If you believe the obvious-that black's are born with superior muscles allowing greater strength and speed-then why are not other "genetic" traits possible? We often hear Irishmen say they were born with the thirst. Could they have been? Is it possible that offspring of alcoholics have greater proclivity toward drink abuse even if adopted into non-alcoholic homes?
Oh, I don't think that anyone is suggesting that genetic predisposition isn't a fact. I personally was discussing the fallacy of 'race' and skin color, which is always the rallying cry of the serially bigoted. Perhaps spect8or, like Bobby Fischer, has Jewish blood in him and can't get his head around the idea.
We have technical education, not you humanitarian bachelor of arts from Devry like yourself . You are the prototype of an educated idiot. You know how to argue but your arguments are not logical because you have no common sense. You would be a perfect government worker, you would STARVE TO DEATH IN THE FREE ENTERPRIZE.How do you determine the race ? Give me a break!
In fact, this is what you are suggesting. If people can be genetically predisposed, then we need to consider who they inherit their genes from. Whites inherit their genes from... other whites. Blacks... from other blacks. Whatever genetic predisposition exists thus can quite logically be assumed -- even in the absence of definitive proof -- to cluster according to race. Lo and behold, this is what science finds. In fact, this sort of obfuscation is the stock in trade of the judaically bigoted. Perhaps he does. Interesting that you think such a thing as "Jewish blood" exists, yet deny the possibility of there being such thing as "white" or "black" blood.
Well, if ever there was a case of projection. Lol. Clearly your comprehension leaves much to be desired. I said if it is impossible to speak of human races then it is impossible to speak of other biological distinctions. Are you aware that no precise definitions exist for the various biological classifications, such that any organism could be properly classed with scientific precision each and every time, utilising the same biological principles? This small level of uncertainty does not seem to inordinately hamper biological investigation. Since it is possible to speak of the various biological classifications, it is also possible to speak of various human races, the inherent imprecision of the term notwithstanding. Similarly, it is entirely possible to speak of "breeds" of dogs despite the inherent imprecision of the term. Take it up with the biologists. You speak the language of a hysterical kike, always johnny on the spot wherever the facts about race threaten the commie and jew imposed status quo of racial equalitarianism. As I said, there is simply no good reason to assume equality, and thus put the onus on the hereditarian to prove difference. As an avowed empiricist you no doubt understand this. Thus I am forced to conclude you obfuscate for solely Jewish reasons. Why do I conclude this? From long experience I have found that Jews predominate in the ranks of race deniers; clearly, they believe they have something to gain from deceiving others. Of course, you here only do it for mass consumption. No one in professional debates has any problem whatever with calling the descendants of the geographic population group originating in Africa "blacks" and the descendants of the geographic population group originating in Europe "whites".
For all you highly educated sounding people that want to debate things endlessly, get a police scanner and listen to the descriptions.... I was shocked when I did that a year ago, blacks doing mayhem every single day, armed robberies, car jacking, purse snatching, beatings, shootings, you name it, 3 out of 4 descriptions were black male/female.... the day of the super-gangster, the psychotic criminal generation of gangsters is here, has been here for a long time really.. a culture with music that glorifies psychotic murdering gangsta's... I think the answer to the thread's original question is Blacks...
I arrived in America full of goodwill and positive feelings towards blacks. Only a week later I was avoiding them as habitually as the most seasoned klansman. I ruefully concluded that what my father and my aunts and uncles (who lived in Detroit -- Detroit) had told me about blacks was only too true. I think this is the way virtually everyone feels. The iq/heredity debates etc are only confirmation of the vast differences that everyone already senses.