Most Dangerous? American Black's or Iraqis

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Pa(b)st Prime, Oct 5, 2006.

  1. Nik is an idiot. Period. Not ONCE has he ever come on this thread and DISPUTED the clear facts that U.S. blacks commit murder at a per capita rate of 8x whites. But of course anyone who questions WHY this occurs and WHY the media and politicians are SILENT is a racist. LMFAO.

    Neither Dan NOR Nik should even be involved in this discussion. Why? Because as an Australian and as a Canadian the two of them know as much about American crime and American Blacks as I do about ice hockey and Australian Rules Football. (although to Dan's credit he knows a lot about the NFL, another reason he's an in tune guy)

    As RM pointed out I'm a native Chicagoan who lives in both Chi-Town and in South Florida. In each city the incident of white crime is RARE. In fact Chicago's murder rate amoung whites is lower than almost any city in Europe. Out of the 600 or so murders that will occur this year in Chicago, less than a DOZEN of them will be committed by whites! So do guns kill or do Blacks kill?

    Nik, talks about un-educated whites harboring predjudice more often than rich folk. I would CERTAINLY think so! What neighborhoods in the North did Blacks flee too? Are they integrated into America's fine "leafy" suburbs? No. The average wealthy, suburban white guy in the States has as much contact with blacks as a Canadian does. Even the liberal, yuppie, gentrifying pioneers stay away from black neighborhoods, prefering instead to re-hab housing stock in formally white "working class" districts. Funny but I don't see the South Bronx or Woodlawn in Chicago or Watts or Anacostia in D.C. becoming en vogue places to reside amoung the liberal elite. Gee, I wonder why? OF COURSE it has NOTHING to do with race or crime. Yea right.

    Nik, I'd like you to find one post where I've EVER said that IMO blacks are geneticlly inferior, geneticlly pre-disposed to crime or any utterance where I've even HINTED that Black's should be reduced in number or marginalized. I HAVE said vis a vis my VAST experiance with blacks, life experiances that DWARF yours, and let's face it, my ENTIRE LIFE dwarfs yours, that 40% of the Black's I've PERSONALLY known are assholes. Given that I live in a city where half of all black males have been INCARCERATED that hardly seems a stretch. In fact I posted this once:

    "I've spoken frankly about race. I grew up and still live in a VERY diverse neighborhood in the city of Chicago. I know the demographics of U.S. cities like the back of my hand. My particular neighborhood would be something like Jackson Hgts in Queens or even more so if you can imagine rolling the Castro, the Mission, the Haight and Hunters Point all into one. So yea Rictor, I've had "black" neighbors, classmates, co-workers and fellow church goers since high school when my neighborhood became an in vogue center of diversity.

    I was like any white, urban kid who listened to Motown, disco and the Philadelphia Sound rather than Judas Priest (I picked a band I've NEVER heard a song by). My inclination, upon the black emigration to my area was to embrace black culture. I was into the whole mystique of Kool as personified by such mid-70's "black" icons as Richard Prior, Redd Foxx, Dr.J., Marvin Gaye, Stevie Wonder, and I hate to admit, Cinque of the SLA!

    "There are many, many, many totally genius, in tune, African-Americans. In EVERY walk of life. But like I've said, IMO,statistically, there's a higher percentage of "blacks" who are pricks, than whites. Period. Now I AGREE that circumstance defines actions. But as someone who doesn't feel that I contributed much to the circumstance, I've become resentful that my lifestyle has to suffer from these alleged "injustices." I already hear much of what you're saying, at least on a spiritual, philosophical plane. Yet in the practical, in a global economy that's given Mexicans, Asians and even native-Africans an edge over African-Americans, all Americans, must examine what's needed to speed along the snail like pace that's occurred since the 1860's."


    Nik is a troll MUCH in the spirit of muZZZlim. As RM pointed out,

    "Another important trolling tip I learned by observing LoZZZer's work: The lioness does not indiscriminately launch an attack on every animal she wishes to eat. She stalks her prey, determining which specific individual antelope is weak, tired and slow. The expert troll must use this very approach, as not every post is worth trolling. ZTroll specifically waits for someone to discuss a topic which is of great personal importance to the prey. With an innate sense of unyielding discipline- a product of millions of years of painstaking troll evolution, ZTroll crouches in the brush, patiently waiting for an <b>emotional, dedicated post.</b> A post where the prey feels so strongly about a certain topic, he can't restrain his emotional enthusiasm when arguing his point. Any post of this sort in chit chat is guaranteed to spark a LoZZZer trolling effort. The predator will then deftly pounce upon its prey, pretending to laugh hysterically at the victim's strong willed, passionate assertions while distorting them in straw-man fashion. Eye on the prize, the creature will then tightly lock its fangs around the prey's neck, clinging tightly to the jugular while deftly wringing the life from its prey until the victim <i><b> cracks</i></b>- i.e., becomes highly frustrated and visibly redfaced. This in turn provides the troll with its well earned nourishment, as well as the creature's only source of sexual gratification: <b> Furious anger and anguish. </b> Thus, the circle of life continues."

    While everyone knows that RM and doodoo are Jewish, that wael is a Muslim, that Pabst is a Chicago white guy, hell half the Board knows who RM and Pabst are BY REAL NAME, loZZZer's like muZZZlim and tradernot are as GUARDED as they can be about "who they are." Telling eh. The biggest trolls are the LEAST open people on an ANONYMOUS message board! Nik, not only does no one care who you REALLY are, no one cares who you PRETEND to be. You're a cypher, a non-enity, a bitter wanna-be.
    Not QUITE as bad as loZZZer but not NEARLY as intelligant as him either. I'll admit it, I could possibly sit down at dinner with loZZZer and enjoy his company. You? I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.
     
    #101     Oct 8, 2006
  2. Rob, I certain you only think that because the word is so tainted by association with Nazism.

    It's really quite an innocent term, simply reducing to meaning a gradual improvement in the gene pool. Early in the 20th plenty of liberals and socialists thought it was a fantastic idea; among them George Bernard Shaw, Beatrice and Sydney Webb (founders of Fabianism) and Margaret Sanger.

    Sure, one way of improving the gene pool would be to simply exterminate the lower classes, but get real, not even Hitler advocated that. As long as the more intelligent classes are outbreeding the less intelligent, that's eugenic. Vice versa, and the effect is dysgenic. Guess which effect our current policies are producing?
     
    #102     Oct 8, 2006
  3. What do you mean why do I care? Africans are starving in Africa, not in Australia - why do so many Australians care? Because it' simple human nature to care when you notice things going wrong. Furthermore, unwed mothers are state subsidized in Austrralia, too, so it's very much a problem on my doorstep.

    Rearden, if you admit it's occurring, how can you not care? Those kids aren't turning into geniuses or captains of industry. They're the next crack whores and gangbangers. If they are outbreeding the intelligent classes, how can that possibly bode well for the future of America?
     
    #103     Oct 8, 2006
  4. I'm discussin much broader issues than simply black criminality, Pabst. But fwiw, I have a personal interest in American blacks. The reason I am in Australia and not America is because my father left decided to leave Detroit after blacks started making it unlivable for him. He didn't move out to the suburbs, like my uncles, he decided to leave the country, because he believed America would never be able to reign its blacks in. He's an old-style racist who's ten times as anti-black as anyone on this board. His ship stopped in Durban (South Africa) once and he never tired of telling what intelligent folks South Africans were, reserving certain areas for Europeans only. I grew up feeling sickened by his views and it poisoned our relationship for years. It's only been in the last year or two that I've come to accept that he was right about much of (though not all) what he said.
     
    #104     Oct 8, 2006
  5. traderob

    traderob

    Specto,
    I think there is already a policy of extermination based on eugenics - the miilions of abortions every year. Who do you think have most of those- (give you a hint, it is not the succesful and wealthy).

    Liberals love the idea, but I would have thought you were looking below the surface, you don't buy into the Darwinian worldview do you?
     
    #105     Oct 8, 2006
  6. Well yeah, that too. Although it's obviously 'extermination' in the sense that liberals and anti-eugencists understand it. To them, 'extermination' means firing squads and gas chambers.

    I'm not really sure I know what the Darwinian worldview is. Certainly I think Darwinism is a valid (and validated) concept.
     
    #106     Oct 8, 2006
  7. Ironic aside. Case in point of how Blacks fail to integrate into society. Yesterday the Tigers of Black majority Detroit eliminated the Yankees. When the cameras would show crowd shots I'd estimate about one in a few hundred fans were black!

    Now before some idiot retorts the tired saw "well Blacks can't afford to attend baseball games' I'd add this is DETROIT! Christ the city is FILLED with high paid black teachers, auto-workers, cops, Federal employees..... I'm sure they can find the money to send their kids to a SOLD OUT 50 Cent concert.....
     
    #107     Oct 8, 2006
  8. How many black faces do you see at American soccer matches? I wonder why. Whites enthusiastically support black dominated sports and yet it's whites who are supposedly the big racists, working 24/7 to exclude the poor black man.
     
    #108     Oct 8, 2006
  9. It still bothers me, but not <b>nearly</b> as much as this country's rapid descent into fascism.

    Why? I can easily escape from the the crack whores and the gangbangers. With my money and my strong preference for rural living, I'm nowhere near the front lines of that battle. The government, on the other hand, is eliminating freedom and destroying liberty in <b>every inch</b> of the nation. ('For the children', of course.) <b>This</b> is an enemy I feel powerless to escape. I feel trapped and helpless under the weight of the government's boot. The fact that I'm one of the few Americans who even <b>cares</b> that we're becoming the new U.S.S.R... that just makes it all so much worse.
     
    #109     Oct 8, 2006
  10. We're closer to becoming Brazil than the U.S.S.R.

    While I share your disdain for both anti drug and gambling laws we should both admit that our over the top suspicion of Muslim's isn't exactly contributing to a laissez faire approach to law enforcement.
     
    #110     Oct 8, 2006